At this moment, NSA's top officers are testifying in a public hearing, claiming that Prism has stopped a number of terror plots. I won't comment on how seriously we should take their assertions. I'm more interested in some of the comments by critics.

One critic's assessment was typical. "The same information could have been discovered by other means."

Let's grant that that may be true, but I'm left with the question "Okay, does could=would? WOULD those plots have been uncovered in time to thwart the attack without Prism? WOULD they have been discovered at all? 

I think we have to assume that perhaps some would have, some would not. Are the ones they would have missed resulted in terror attacks? Of course they would have.

Under many circumstances you'll find people here at TA using the "If if saves one life" argument to support this or that. Why not apply it here?

Tags: NSA, Prism, terrorism

Views: 27

Reply to This

Forum

The Cross

Started by Belle Rose in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists. Last reply by Davis Goodman 3 hours ago. 21 Replies

Help Think Atheist!

Started by David Smith in Theistic Arguments and Debate Help. Last reply by Simon Mathews 11 hours ago. 18 Replies

How do you cure Insanity???

Started by Belle Rose in Advice. Last reply by MikeLong 21 hours ago. 38 Replies

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service