Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on September 11, 2012 at 12:50pm

Why did she call you in the first place, instead of praying for the speaker system to self-repair/?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Unseen on September 11, 2012 at 12:55pm

Hey, if parting a sea is no big deal, not to mention creating a universe, what's a speaker system?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James Cox on September 11, 2012 at 6:01pm

'God's' vanity is ok, yours is not I guess?

Damn, I have a whole list of hardware and supplies, I would like to have, but Nooo...

Permalink Reply by Ron Humphrey on September 8, 2012 at 9:33am

So all children from the moment of birth should be put out of their misery.  It takes years for them to grow up and accept Jesus.  Until then they are sinners.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Milos Cakovan on October 3, 2012 at 2:29pm

So what you are saying is that once again god made us sick, and then hates us because he fucked up? How can a perfect being make mistakes of this magnitude?

Also, the simple fact that you even want to try and justify murder of children makes me sick.

The death of children is very sad.  But we are sinners and sinful from birth, enemies of God.  God punished all of Egypt with the death of their firstborn, even the cattle.  And who are we to say how God should deal with his enemies.

Didn't god harden Pharaoh's heart so that he would have an excuse to murder the children? If he can harden his heart, why not soften it and make sure the Jews would be free?

Who are we to say how god should deal with his enemies? Apparently we are a lot more loving, caring, compassionate, understanding and sane, if this is how he handles his business.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ron Humphrey on September 8, 2012 at 9:32am

Can you honestly look at the condition of the world and the human race and declare that this god of yours is a godof justice?  No way.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karim Salama on August 5, 2012 at 3:02pm

A question I like to ask to all creationists: "How can you imagine an independent Chihuahua living in the nature?"

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Diane on August 6, 2012 at 6:46am

Oh I love that one.  I pictured Princess, the vicious Chihuahua monster who hates me passionately, surviving in the wild.  I love dogs, but Princess is a deranged pseudo-alpha female wolf-bitch wannabe with some kind of selective Napolean complex.  In the wild, she would have nobody to bring her food to her cushy little bed like her humans do now.

I'll be seeing Princess in a few minutes.  I'm going to taunt her with , "You're no wolf.  I know wolves - and you're not one.  God, out of spite and hatred for the world, created the vicious, loathsome beast that you are.  Why?  I don't know."  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer on September 4, 2012 at 5:07am

There was no original dog. They evolved from wolves. Genetic mutation is not "always bad". That is a christian idea of evolution.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on September 7, 2012 at 9:33pm

I'd wager everyone has their preferences, but, personally,I would highly recommend the set of mutations that allows us to experience pleasurable orgasms.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Heather Spoonheim on September 7, 2012 at 9:34pm

@Paul McKinney

The mutation that gives those of recent African decent an increased immunity to malaria is 'good', in my opinion at least.  The mutation that gives Ashkenazi Jews an increase immunity to tuberculosis is 'good', in my opinion.  The various mutations that allow extremophiles to live in extreme environments are good for them - don't you think.  Did you need some more specific examples?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on September 7, 2012 at 9:47pm

I would say the genetic mutations that ultimately allowed us to walk upright, which resulted in even more mutations that allowed for larger brain development than our ancestors, and led, finally to the development of speech.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 23
• 24
• 25
• 26
• 27
• …
• 39
• Next ›
• Page