The subject title says it all. To listen to some GOP'ers talk, you'd think socialism was Communism.

Views: 2475

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

@jason sadler

No slavery, no blues, no jazz, no rock and roll, no hip-hop. I wonder what our world would be like without them?

Cultures in conflict?

In a writing class I took, a student asked if personal suffering helps people become great writers. Among the younger students in the class, it was not a welcome thought. I was in my forties and found truth in the idea.

Forget the cultures in conflict idea. Instead, consider individuals who have suffered in some way.

Socialism doesn't ensure that everyone is wealthy and without need.  It can just ensure that everyone is healthy and educated, like Cara Coleen said.  And anyway, there are plenty of other ways that people can feel suffering and trauma.  No matter what your socioeconomic class, we are all subject to heartache and other traumas that occur in life.  I don't think that socialism or communism would wipe out or even diminish art from being created.

Sure we all experience teen angst and ups and downs, people will have traffic accidents, etc., but that's NOT the same as struggling to have enough food to survive such that you have to steal. It's not the same as living under a government that makes dissidents disappear. 

Most great art of the past has been a product of struggle.

A lot of them use healthcare as a "true" example, stating that the medical community needs to compete to advance.

Well, the GOP/conservative argument is that competition keeps prices down. This raises the question of why competition has been resulting in an upward spiraling of medical costs. Perhaps, health care isn't a normal market for several reasons, the main one being that medical matters are highly technical with researching them beyond the skills of typical consumers. Secondly, many medical decisions don't allow time for the consumer to do much research and in fact many such decisions are made on the spot. Finally, the consumer trusts the expertise of the doctor to recommend a treatment strategy, but the doctor strategy, whatever it is, has an impact on the doctor's bottom line. 

Yes, Unseen, you are right about health care not being a normal market.  Much of the inflationary costs in our health care system can be blamed on the fact that the major health insurance companies have carved up the country into fiefdoms so they don't have to deal with competition and can charge what they wish.  ( See Matt Taibbi's Griftopia.)  When you consider the government bailouts of the financial industry, how can we criticize socialism?  Cara is right.  People and their susceptibility to corruption causes political systems to decline.  As someone said,  "As organizations age, they become increasingly more bloated and corrupt."  This is true for monarchies, churches, communism and democracies. 

Gallup's Mirror, thanks for that tid-bit.  It might be common knowledge for some of the omniscient here, but I had no idea - being a Brit in the USA some of these origins fascinate me.  This one certainly did.  Cheers!

And now we seemingly are stuck with a system based on people working for corporations. Anyone working for themselves, unless they are quite successful at it, is screwed. And out of work? You're pretty much stuck with using the ER as your "doctor."

The problem with medical "competition" is elasticity. Consumers are perfectly elastic when it comes to medical needs; it doesn't matter the cost, they will pay the price because they must. Unlike other commodities, like vehicles, the seller has the consumer over a barrel and it is beyond easy to take advantage of them. This is basic economics that apparently the GOP is ignoring (currently in an Econ class haha).

Healthcare is simply a field that must be regulated. There's no "competition" here; all who stand to make a profit will raise prices, and "competitors" will raise theirs to match... not lower them to attract consumers. They don't have to keep their prices low.

providing the basics so that one doesn't have to concentrate on how to provide a basic living for oneself

Sounds like paradise to me. Also, if I didnt have to work to support my family, I would be able to work on projects more personal to me. So rather than making software to help mining companies squeeze and extra dollar out of their mine, I could be writing open source software that helps everyone while eating government supplied food in a government supplied house.

Matt, do I see a bit of sarcasm in your post?


© 2019   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service