I don't want this to be a chance for you to tell me what is wrong with the theocratic abscess burrowed; the thorn in your side or the vacant imperfection imposed upon the resident scapegoat. I care not to afford you the opportunity to lick your wounds in my sight or to appease the cultural norms subscribed.
Without the fear on the other side of the fence nor the ruckus in the alley way I want you to tell me what the benefit of an atheist lifestyle is had the social and political majority not absolved you and the necessary protestation of that artificial insemination had manifested itself in hindsight.
In other words, had there been no myth where would you see yourself rather than where would you see yourself in light of it.
Replies are closed for this discussion.
The omnigod is a religious farce. It isn't supported by scripture.
Yes, we are - you and I have been through this before --
That's debatable and depends on your definition of certain words
Well we are all born atheists similar to being born gay or hetero.
Is not correct.
Totally different, one is culture and the other is biology.
I'm not sure which premise you're saying, "not correct" to, Greg, that we are born atheists, or the assertion that the two conditions are similar - I suspect the latter, as it should be obvious that we are born without a belief in ANYthing. You might even call us, a-omniests --
Yes, can you make more effort in writing them please?
Spewing water through the nose is almost always a good thing.
Hot coffee does a better job of clearing out the sinuses, but avoiding one's keyboard in the process is certainly preferable.
Further, babies are born without the capacity of belief, they are born with undeveloped brains.