I don't want this to be a chance for you to tell me what is wrong with the theocratic abscess burrowed; the thorn in your side or the vacant imperfection imposed upon the resident scapegoat. I care not to afford you the opportunity to lick your wounds in my sight or to appease the cultural norms subscribed.

Without the fear on the other side of the fence nor the ruckus in the alley way I want you to tell me what the benefit of an atheist lifestyle is had the social and political majority not absolved you and the necessary protestation of that artificial insemination had manifested itself in hindsight.

In other words, had there been no myth where would you see yourself rather than where would you see yourself in light of it.

Views: 3100

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Good news, Marc!  There is a god for that kind of side-effect.

Strega! Now that is a god with a serious problem :)

Yeah, I hear Osama bin Laden said it too --

I've heard about this within the different native american tribes.

Are you angry, David?  Does your anger stem from frustration or fear?  Are you afraid of what you have found here? 

 

You came here to reinforce the superiority of your beliefs.  That is a dangerous way to bolster your faith.  Sometimes we encounter ideas that we cannot defeat and we must accept a new paradigm.  This is why most people of the faith prefer to hide from ideas and information that contradicts their belief system.  Yet you seek them out.  It is not possible to debate without engaging the ideas of the other side.  Perhaps something has broken through your defenses.  Are you thinking atheist?

 

Do not fear.  You can find value in living beyond the God paradigm. 

Uh...:

Are you angry, David?

Is that a rhetorical question?

IMHO, D.H. is a very angry individual, an outcast having a difficult time finding a place in society.  Can you imagine how hard it is for D. H. to find others to hang out with?  Given what little you have experienced of him, how many of you would truly want to have dinner with him more then once?

Judging from D. H.'s comments I see him as a religious movement of one, David is the Messiah of the Truth according to D. H., he is the Shepherd of his flock of one.

Maybe he will become the next L. Ron Hubbard (who BTW died with a net worth of over $600 Million, now that's a successful religious leader).

GroupWikipedia: A group is a number of things or persons being in some relation to one another.

Come to the darkside David.

I'm thinking this is our David Henson. Let's be Facebook friends!

David,

well, then why think atheist. You must be aware of Descartes, 'I think therefore I am'. Maybe thinking ain't what you like, but the people here think and lack a belief in god[s]. 

I don't want this to be a chance for you to tell me what is wrong with the theocratic abscess burrowed; the thorn in your side or the vacant imperfection imposed upon the resident scapegoat. I care not to afford you the opportunity to lick your wounds in my sight or to appease the cultural norms subscribed. 

This is a statement of what you don't want. Can you possibly tell us what you want without having to result to insults? As I have told you before, am not aware the admin sent you a memo, if you think you are resident scapegoat, stop fooling yourself and get a life. we didn't ask for one to come so I didn't care what you want to call yourself.

You know for one who claims to have been an atheist for 27 years, you come out to be really ignorant. Atheism is not a lifestyle, or are you saying bald head is a lifestyle? Atheism simply is a lack of belief in god[s] something I thought you should know. The little confidence I had in your schooling is waning by the day, if you continue this way, I'll propose you claim a refund from the school where you paid the fees, they seem not to have helped you!

Why should I care, except that we must resist the current myths since they make claims about science that are based on ghosts and demand we live according to some laws given by a sky god who was a failure from the word go when he attempted programming. Now this god if it does exist which you failed to prove in the two threads you started should have remained in her sleep maybe we would not be here responding to such verbiage from you.

On a side note, it doesn't matter how many discussions you start, you still have got to clear the matter of Gen 1:1 word 3 and 4.

The little confidence I had in your schooling is waning by the day, if you continue this way, I'll propose you claim a refund from the school where you paid the fees, they seem not to have helped you!

Onyango, honey, you brighten my day :)

I've never before in my life used THE two-word reply in a forum. In general doing so forfeits too much. In this particular case, though, it seemed, really, the ONLY response to the overwhelming hubris of David submission.

Mike, I am sure many of us were thinking it and longing to say it.  My thought had considerably more f-bombs in it.  We're talking like Samuel L. Jackson  in Pulp Fiction here....

RSS

Events

Services we love!

© 2015   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service