Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Frink on May 24, 2009 at 3:19pm

Ending a note with "Fuck you." How characteristically Christian of him.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brutus on June 29, 2009 at 2:49pm

Ouch, that logic gave me whiplash.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Charles Stover on July 8, 2009 at 2:03am

Maybe you should reply with the definition of atheism and the definition of agnosticism. Or perhaps point out his flawed logic by stating that to know there is a God, one would have to know all things, yada, yada. Also, end your statement with "Fuck you." for no apparent reason. I must have missed that section of the Bible that said, "Thou shalt be a dick to anyone who disagrees," because I coulda sworn Jesus did the opposite.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Britton on July 14, 2009 at 4:25pm

"Thou shalt be a dick to anyone who disagrees"....Exactly.If nobody follows their convoluted logic,we're told to fuck ourselves.We're wrong because we refuse to believe and being the minority ,we're all assholes.What do you expect from them?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeremy Roney on July 11, 2009 at 4:29am

Atheist - The BELIEF that there is no god.

Following their logic the only person that can be a theist is god himself, therefore it must follow that they are in fact an agnostic at best and an atheist at worst. Wonder how that makes them feel?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by skool on July 11, 2009 at 8:35am

Reading that email reminded me of this quote:

"There is a difference between believing there is no god and not believing there is a god -- both are atheistic, though popular usage has ignored the latter..." - Dan Barker

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Britton on July 14, 2009 at 4:20pm

That doesn't even make any sense,but it's coming from a christian so it's really not surprising.Quit wasting your time and just come to terms with no afterlife,no fantasy land called heaven;it's all just mumbo-jumbo horseshit.Get a grip,be your own person and when you do ...FUCK-OFF!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Frink on July 14, 2009 at 5:03pm

When you go to bed and the ground is clear and then, when you wake up, there's snow on the ground, you can safely conclude that IT SNOWED. You don't have to see it--evidence indicates it. State's attorneys aren't eye-witnesses to the crimes they're trying to prosecute, but they have evidence that points one way or another. The evidence is interpreted and deduced to a conclusion. Again, you don't have to see the event in question to make a judgment about it as long as you have evidence to support your findings.

Fuck, these people are stupid!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Placanica on July 22, 2009 at 1:29pm

I don't get it how is that the only person who can be an atheist is god if god isn't depicted as a person. And how can he even be an atheist if he must believe he himself exists. I swear these creationists are the dumbest people on the planet, they make an argument that makes no sense whatsoever

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Colin G. Wood on July 23, 2009 at 7:21pm

Isn't it what Richard dawkin's said, that is, god is either to complex where as he is putting it. If got is so complex then it doesn't exist. Why would such a super human being concern it self with such a planet?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page