Preface:

Let me begin this thread by stating that I read through the topic of transhumanism started by our esteemed TA member Nate Lundgren last year and felt like it did not address the issue of consciousness transfer. There was a lengthy debate on the definition/semantics of transhumanism and whether it is rightfully characterized as dogma. Hopefully this thread will focus more on the implications of transferring human consciousness into an alien body.

_________________________________________________________________________________

If the technology was available and you were near the end of your physical life would you consider transferring your consciousness into a droid/robot? If our consciousness is our primary essence would this process not ensure our existence 'in perpetuity'?  Also, if you could specify, would you request having the dark unfortunate memories of your current human existence not transferred?  

As technological advancements gain increasing momentum we are toying with the ability to transfer our very cognitive thoughts at some point. Would our taking over the controls of human evolutionary development in the "posthuman age" lead to an improvement as a sentient being or it would it all unravel and be our ultimate demise?

There are certainly many considerations. A large one being would we retain our present compliment of emotional states after the transfer? Would our mental state develop in the direction of being a purely logic-oriented being devoid of compassion and empathy? That would be a wrong turn in my estimation. 

I see where it could become a very slippery slope indeed. On the other hand having the ability to glide endlessly into the future with my consciousness jumping from agent to agent is alluring.

Tags: consciousness, transhumanism

Views: 568

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It would only be a facsimile of your consciousness.  Like stepping on a Star Trek transporter, you are destroyed and a copy is constructed somewhere else.

But to the 'transportee' nothing has changed.

Really?  The 'transportee' could be obliterated, but a perfect copy produced elsewhere.  You'd be dead, but someone else identical to you would have come into existence.

In the fictional world of Star Trek. However, it isn't clear that a transporter clone (which is what it is, in a way) who has the same body and memories as the original transportee is actually the same person. They might simply be a facsimile.

This may be all the Starship Enterprise needs, but did a personal consciousness get transported along with the reconstructed body and brain? Who knows?

Look at it this way: If we could create a clone of you and put you beside that clone, would your consciousness be in two places at the same time? I don't think so. It would just be a person who looks like you and thinks it has the same personal history.

Do you admit there's a problem when you look at it that way?

The desire for immortality is a fetishism of the self.

Nice, Dave.  I may have to tweet that :)

"The desire for immortality is a fetishism of the self." 

As cognitive beings is it irrational to look for a means to self perpetuate? Self preservation is the greatest of motivators.

Explain atheists in fox holes. Their actions may lead to their permanent demise. They must have more than self preservation motivating their actions.

@Kairan;

You make a good point, however self-preservation IS a major motivator, but so IS self-sacrifice.  Which is more of a motivator?  An interesting paradox.

@Dave Mann;

"Every moment is a little death as the person you are is replaced by a new you."

So profound.

Your body's cells are totally replaced over a period of 7 to 10 years (the time estimate depends on the source). It is the design ot form determined by the DNA which is constant. (source)

I am evolving as a human, and the person I am today is NOT the person I was even 6 months ago, and the person I was 6 months ago is not the same person I was 4 years ago. The person I will be a year from now will be so different than the person I am today, and the person I will be at the end of my life will be so different than the person I was when I was born, and trying to "copy" this to a disc or hard drive or "computerize it" in any way sounds absurd to me. Which "me" is worth copying? The person I am today? Or the person I will be before I die? What if I die tomorrow? I don't really want the person I am today "copied"....I assume those who would invest in such a product must already be happy with themselves or they would not see themselves as "worth copying." I'm not finished with my journey by a LONG shot but when I reach MY enlightenment it will not be something that can be transported to USB. Some experiences are too precious to tamper with.

Your consciousness is the result of all life's experiences. There is a constant change in that consciousness, hopefully for the better. Remember, one option is to transfer to another agent without the dark unfortunate memories of your being.

RSS

Support T|A

Think Atheist is 100% member supported

All proceeds go to keeping Think Atheist online.

Donate with Dogecoin

Members

Blog Posts

Zella Mae Jarrett

Posted by Philip Jarrett on April 19, 2014 at 11:35pm 2 Comments

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Into life hacks? Check out LabMinions.com

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service