BERLIN — Twitter waded into potentially perilous territory on Thursday when it blocked users in Germany from access to the account of a neo-Nazi group that is banned by the government here.

The move was the first time that Twitter acted on a policy known as “country-withheld content,” announced in January, in which it will block an account at the request of a government. But the company cracked open the gates to a complex new era in which it will increasingly have to referee legal challenges to the deluge of posts that has made the site so popular.

The company said the goal was to balance freedom of expression with compliance with local laws.

(source)

While the idea of blocking content where said content is illegal seems reasonable on its face, it flies against the widely-held notion that information should, with extremely rare exceptions, be widely available (exceptions being cases where secrecy trumps the public's right to know).

However, stop and think about it. How does the principle Twitter is applying to dictatorships, for example. Doesn't withholding anti-government tweets make Twitter complicit with the dictators?

Should Twitter have given in to the German government. Bear in mind, that should Twitter have any assets in Germany or should any of its officers visit Germany, they could be held and charged with what is a very serious crime in Germany.

And Germany isn't the only European country which seeks to block neo-Nazi propaganda from reaching their citizens.

Tags: Nazi, Twitter, freedom, neo-Nazi, of, speech

Views: 41

Reply to This

  

Forum

Deepak's challenge

Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Davis Goodman 9 minutes ago. 21 Replies

It happened

Started by Belle Rose in Atheist Parenting. Last reply by Davis Goodman 5 hours ago. 70 Replies

Disorders of Sex Development

Started by ɐuɐz ǝllǝıuɐp in Small Talk. Last reply by Tor Hershman 7 hours ago. 3 Replies

Living freely.

Started by Quincy Maxwell in Society. Last reply by Gallup's Mirror 10 hours ago. 21 Replies

What is the purpose of gender

Started by Christopher Swicegood in Small Talk. Last reply by Heather Spoonheim yesterday. 56 Replies

Events

Blog Posts

Labels

Posted by Quincy Maxwell on July 20, 2014 at 9:37pm 0 Comments

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service