I am not for war, but is it sometimes necessary? Ask Americans why we are at war and you will get different answers.

We provide healthcare for other countries when thousands of Americans can't afford insurance. We put our troops in danger for another country's "freedom". We have alliances that make enemies of other countries. We supply and support Israel. All for what? How exactly does this benefit America?

Should we continue doing what we have been doing or should we just stay over here and mind our own business? I am eager to see how other atheists view this.

Views: 341

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Richard Holbrooke was a warmonger par excellence. He didn't have many friends, but one real friend he did find in Thaçi, whose organ trafficking maffia regime in former Serbian province Kosovo is today thanks to Holbrooke an independent, well on their way to become another failed, state. Holbrooke was a disaster for humanity and it is no loss for the world he can't actively do any harm anymore. Now we just have to deal with his disastrous legacy.

I'm reading & watching more now. I'm still skeptical that issues are as clear as some people claim, but it is clear I have to learn more.
here's the thing: United States have to assert their dominance and remind everyone who is the top dog.  Over time maybe one or two countries will forget who is the top dog and think that the states is slacking so they will go attack the states. so yes they do have to do what' they're doing.
What country would be able to attack the US. Only Canada perhaps in some weird parallel Universe. It is about power dominance indeed, global power. But the age of US supremacy is nearly over, not despite some threat to it's military superiority, but because it is betting all on it.
The US might at least have tried to show some honour by attacking their enemies with that mighty military of theirs rather than always using cowardly, covert tactics like funding foreign rebels through third party corporations with money they got trading guns with drug cartels.

muaha ha ha ROFLMAO and LMAO again!

That would be like lampreys deciding to attack sharks! Parallel universe indeed :)

Canada could just stop exporting oil to the USA - even sharks can die of hunger.

:P

FTW!

It does not matter which country. The attack won't serve to crumble the United States, but to do damage. A surprise bomb drop to a medium sized city will cause a lot of pain not just physical pain.

That is at least not flat-out impossible as your previous suggestion, but nearly so as it would accomplish exactly nothing. Unless the US military reaction itself is your goal, as it was and remains the strategy of Al Qaida in a repetition to their slaying of the USSR: to pinprick the beast until it bleeds to death, they need to be able to reach it first.

No, we do not have to and should not attempt to assert our dominance. 

 

History teaches us that all things have an end- U.S. dominance will have an end just as Roman, Turkish, French, British etc. dominance had an end.

It is not entirely true. The empires may have ended, but their acheivements permeates modern society - Roman law, Ottoman (there was never been a Turkish empire) science, French humanist ideals, and British politics.

What will be the legacy of the U.S. is too soon to tell, but I doubt it will follow the course of its predecessors in the Americas which mostly slipped through the sands of time.

RSS

Gizmo Gadget - Purveyros of the finest gadgets this side of the Amazon

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.

Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

© 2013   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service