Hello members of Think Atheist.  I don't remember this topic being brought up before so here it is.

The reason I am asking this is because on the Ok Cupid dating website, after browsing quite a  number of female profiles - they were able to answer a question and the question is as follows: 

"Do you think the man should be the head of the household?"

Well, to my surprise, I have seen quite a few females answer 'Yes' to the question and haven't yet seen a female answer 'No'. 

In my opinion, I think it makes no sense to call a man the head of the household and that it is also sexist. 

But apparently the females who answered the question wish it were true. 

1.)  Why do you think this is so?  Because females have this innate desire to be submissive?  Or is it because females want to hold onto the traditional so called 'values' associated with marriage?  Does this somehow go along the lines of the females wanting what they call an 'alpha male'?  Or something else entirely? 

2.)  If you feel you want to answer the question as a 'Yes', then why?  If you say 'No' , then why? 

3.)  What is your definition of 'head of the household'?  Does this mean all decisions are made by the male?  Does this imply the party who is working full time and earning the money get's to make the decisions? 

I look forward to reading the replies! 

Views: 2574

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes men are the heads of the household. And women are the backbones :)

Isn't it possible to NOT generalize? Okay, you've expressed that you prefer the take-charge kind of man, which is fine for you, but it doesn't make it universally true... nor is it universally "best".

Why can't we just say that SOME men are the heads of their households? There are many women heads. I get the intention behind saying the woman is the backbone, or even the neck (she turns the head, after all)... but I also find that phrasing patronizing. It's like being told winning silver is just as good as winning gold, and "you get an 'A' for effort!" It's the whole smile and nod, "Sure, you're in charge, dear... in your own, 'special' way!" *wink*

In my relationship, we're partners. We both have our strengths and weaknesses. Never will I defer to him simply because he's male. If he's shown himself to be more informed on something (like gadgets and technology), I'll defer to him because I know it's an area he's well-versed. My domain is writing, art, argumentation/debate, etc. I'm actually more logical... and, as it turns out, logic is learned, not inherited or attached to a certain Y chromosome.

Hear, hear!

What I stated is a metaphor, and it could be interpreted many different ways. I'm sorry if you took it to be patronizing. I actually meant it to be an empowering statement.

Oh I know the spirit in which you meant it. I think you're awesome, Belle. It's hard to disagree with someone without sounding poopy... so, I'm not trying to sound poopy. :)

My own personal philosophy is probably very different. I have stated in other threads that I'm very "pro male." I don't believe that one gender is any better than the other. That would be silly. But I do know that men and women ARE different. I believe that unfortunately from a young age boys are not nurtured to express emotion. They are also not rewarded for expressing "feelings" the same way girls are. But that doesn't mean that boys (and men) don't have feelings that need validation. Men do need to feel important, and they need to feel love just like women do. Maybe not always in the same romantic sense of the word, but they need to feel needed. So when I say the man is the "head" I would purposefully put him in that place. The place of having my deepest respect.

When I say the woman is the backbone, it's a place of strength. Funny story........I'm telling this from memory and don't know it to be true, but it's funny......: It's said that Barbara Bush was with her husband (George Bush) at a gas station filling up gas, she saw an old high school sweet heart working there as the attendant, and she said, "he was my old boyfriend." And George said, "good thing you didn't end up with him," and to which she replied, "What do you mean? If I had married him he would have been president too!" Lol.......

One thing I can say is that once you have kids, your opportunities professionally become very limited in a way that a man's opportunities aren't. A woman as a mother is the strength and nurturer of her children, naturally, and men are too, but their natural impulse is to provide for his family. So I think of the backbone as being the support for everything...the core, and yes, holding up the head. It's a very traditional view, but it's my own personal ideal.....for myself. Not for anybody else. I know that it's not universally true. It is what I would have wished for for my family....but, I'm the head and the backbone, the head of my household had his head up his ass, lol.

Hello, I have two things to say: first, if you want to hear some interesting answers, you should make an account on Fetlife and ask on there. I guarantee there are women on there who will answer no.

Second, to answer your question. I truly believe in equality between the sexes, this would lead one to think that dual leadership would be my preference. I don't believe in equality of personalities, so whichever person is better suited to lead will probably naturally take charge. Traditionally this has been the male but in the modern world, there's no reason the female couldn't/wouldn't naturally be a better fit for the role.

Marriages should always consist of three (or some other odd number of) partners. That way there can never be a tie and every important decision is arrived at on a democratic basis. No need for a head of household. Whether the marriage consists of 2 men/1 woman, 2 women/1 man, 3 men, 3 women, 2 trannies/1 plushie...(you get my point, and we can add in homosexuality for variety as well) is a matter for the people who ally themselves to settle.

The dominant party will end up being the head of the household. That's simply the way things work among mammals, and we are mammalian.

People are crazy i think the men an the women work together there is no head of anything.

Perhaps distressingly, both men and women prefer to be led by the person with the deeper voice:

People tend to prefer to follow the deeper voice:
Cara Tigue from McMaster University in Canada, who conducted the research, said: "We're looking at men's low voice-pitch as a cue to dominance, which is related to leadership.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8888727/Dee...

Women with lower voices tend to do better as leaders:
Researchers at two US universities made recordings of both male and female speakers and then altered the pitch of their subjects' voices. In the study, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, listeners "voted" more frequently for the "candidate" with the lower voice.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17355013

Sweet! Then I'm totally the head. ;)

RSS

Support T|A

Think Atheist is 100% member supported

All proceeds go to keeping Think Atheist online.

Donate with Dogecoin

Members

Forum

Things you hate.

Started by Devlin Cuite in Small Talk. Last reply by Zachary L. Hagedorn 13 minutes ago. 168 Replies

Blog Posts

Seeing the man in the child.

Posted by Diane on April 19, 2014 at 9:52am 0 Comments

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Into life hacks? Check out LabMinions.com

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service