In my opinion, a person should be able to charge for services that they can give away if they want. Who are they hurting? Two or more consenting adults make an arrangement that is between themselves.

Why is it that women and men for that matter, are still being  controlled by governments in the bedroom? Is the bible or religion running our societies? 

Who or what decided on things that are moral or immoral?

Just because a person doesn't want to do something themselves, I for one, doesn't give them the right to "Preach" to others what to do..

 

 

Tags: freedom, government, morals, religion, sex, women

Views: 422

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think prostitution (and other forms of sex work) should be legal but, because of the risks of disease and abuse, should be regulated with those two ends in mind only.

 

What causes the most harm is our lack of  value and respect for the human being - if sex workers were properly valued and respected as human beings first the majority of the danger they currently face would cease.

 

Yes, Dear Judgmental Christian Reader, it is you who are partly responsible for young girls being abused and trafficked for sex - because where sex work is outlawed it is invariably taken over by the violent criminals - fueling them with funds instead of the sex workers themselves.  Providing the criminal capitol for ever escalating abuses.  And these societies often don't care because they are just 'whores' - sinners who deserve what they get - instead of valued members of society treated like human beings and given full rights and protections.

 

The sheer stupidity of the modern prohibitionist attitude towards sex and drugs is staggering.  How long will it take us to learn that it is NOT in our best interests to setup a system that feeds TRILLIONS of dollars to violent criminals.  It would be difficult to calculate but you can be almost certain that the vast majority of violent crime is a DIRECT result of prohibitions (primarily drugs, including alcohol, and sex work). I really don't understand how we wised up over Alcohol prohibition and have utterly failed to address the VASTLY worse situation created from sex work and 'drug' prohibition.

Crime doesn't pay, until some moron tries to legislate morality

Dark Star, You are 'spot on' in your summary of the situation.   As always, the various religionists, of a 1,000 different persuasions have imposed their opposition to legalization of prostitution in America.  President Nixon's 'war on drugs' was lost - the day it was declared forty years ago.  It merely funded the criminals, & cost America hundreds of billions of dollars. Between prosecuting & housing those convicted & lost tax revenue, we could balance our budget with the costs of criminalizing prostitution & drugs.                    President Roosevelt ended prohibition with an eye toward the tax revenue that was so badly needed then, as now.

Thanks!   Don't get me started on Nixon and Anslinger: http://goo.gl/gTZV0

 

I would like to clarify one thing though (calling myself out on it).  I only used 'Christians' as an example, the problem obviously runs wider and deeper than just Christians and there are Christians who see the damage these polices do as well.  It's just that where I live (US South) they are the majority of the issue but I AM aware of the differences so just wanted to be clear that I don't see it solely as a 'Christian' problem.

if person is willing to give sex for money why don't they try to work at strip club or go into the porn industry

IDK, maybe they don't have the body for that. Maybe they can't dance or don't want to perform on camera.
Because there is a demand outside of those industries for their "product"

Maybe they don't want to?

 

Maybe they want to do what they like with their own body without being told what to do by idealogues?

Here in New Zealand prostitution is legal. It's also legal to be a streetwalker but public solicitation is illegal. Also, if I'm not mistaken, there are local regulations on where "houses" are located and what kind of signage is displayed.

I see nothing wrong with legal streetwalkers, because prostitutes here WANT to be well-known to police. I believe the police keep pretty close tabs on the girls for their protection (sorry, I've never noticed a male streetwalker). This practice is also, I believe, restricted to a certain areas - just like there's a fashion district and used-car district - it makes sense.

Love your position, Robin, that other jobs that people don't especially like are not illegal. However prostitution is not a profession which is universally hated by its practitioners. Talking to a former President of the New Zealand Prostitutes Collective, she assured me that plenty like their work (though not necessarily every trick) - and it pays well.

What a fiery discussion! I haven't seen anyone disagree. :-)

"sorry, I've never noticed a male streetwalker" - I have, on a documentary about heroin addiction... seems alot of people who are addicted to heroin will turn to prostitution to finance their habit.

 

On another note, I think I would be open to being a prostitute if I wasn't in a monogamous relationship and wasn't already employed. As you said, good money... could be put into savings, tuition, or other investments.

"I think I would be open to being a prostitute"

Yeah, me too. I'm sure there's a BIG market for a 66-year-old with a pot belly and a pocket full of blue pills. :-)

 

LOL!!!! There's a market for pot belly older men, I'm sure of it!!! Especially being that you come prepared.

I don't really have a problem with it. No matter what anyone wants to claim, I certainly believe it is safer for it to be legal than outlawed. It would help prevent diseases from going around and the prostitutes themselves would be a lot safer.

 

Of course, it would have to be with adults, but besides that, I do not know or care if it is "immoral". I do not believe that anyone is getting hurt when two consenting adults make this type of decision. I mean, some relationships could be messed up, but the legalization wouldn't be the cause. They would do it anyway.

 

Yes, religion has a heavy influence on every country's laws, even when freedom of religion is there. I agree that they have no right to tell others what to do just because they believe it is wrong. That is not the purpose of laws. The purpose of laws is to protect people and I believe that legalizing prostitution would keep us safer.

RSS

Forum

Nude atheist group

Started by Raymond in Society. Last reply by Raymond 5 hours ago. 4 Replies

Socratic Method

Started by Michael in Ethics & Morals. Last reply by onyango makagutu yesterday. 2 Replies

Babies Are Not Born Atheists

Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by Saul Dobney 2 hours ago. 17 Replies

Gideons International

Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by _Robert_ yesterday. 5 Replies

Events

Blog Posts

YES

Posted by Reg The Fronkey Farmer on May 23, 2015 at 5:00pm 9 Comments

The Purpose of Atheism

Posted by Pope Beanie on May 22, 2015 at 8:35pm 3 Comments

Services we love!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2015   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service