Oh, good. Yet another discussion about what gays should or should not be allowed to do. I'm glad these discussions come up every once in a while. Otherwise, I might start to think that I have actual rights. It's good to be reminded that I am simply "allowed" to do something if enough straight people think it's okay.
I am also very gratified to know that there are studies which show that children raised by same-sex parents turn out okay. Although, I do sometimes wonder about the dumbfuck rednecks who live in the trailer park down the road. I doubt they needed to have a study performed before they were "allowed" to have kids. Also, they often seem incapable of forming a coherent sentence, so I would be very surprised to find that they were granted the opportunity to procreate by winning a debate.
Yes, I know. Now, I'm just being silly. Of course they can procreate as often as they please. They are straight, after all. For a minute there, I guess I forgot my place. Please forgive my impudence. It's late, and I'm tired.
I guess I'll go to sleep now. If that's okay with everyone. Hmmm. Maybe this could be the next topic which is up for debate. Gay sleepy time: deadly menace or harmless fun?
Of course Gays/Lesbians should be able to have IVF.
Ask your bigoted friends this: should widowed parents whose spouses died in, say, the war in Iraq, be subject to have their kids taken from them because they no longer have a mother and a father? What, pray tell, is the difference?
NO such thing as human rights, Thats another myth perpetrated by corrupt governments and leaders. All we have are privileges granted by the sate. Me I think the state should keep to doing things for people that they cant do for themselves. I think people are quite capable of deciding for themselves if they should have children and the method they choose to conceive and birth.
Its got FA to do with anybody else.
There are way to many people around these days who want to tell others what they can and can't do. Eventually people will get so pissed off with it all there will be violence!
There is such thing as human rights - human rights are ideas of how people should be treated by their governments and by fellow human beings... there are no such thing as inalienable/god given/absolute human rights since as you said the state/government can either protect them or take them away in certain circumstances and since what we consider human rights change from time to time.
"Can they provide a child with a loving, stable home?"
Since when did that make any difference. Any woman of child birthing age can get herself knocked up when ever she feels like it. Why should things be different just because of sexual orientation. Why does anybody need somebody elses permission at all? Are we living in China now????
Permalink Reply by M on October 26, 2010 at 10:00pm
OK, I concur with that point. They should have the same rights as the tweakers I see in the store who obviously don't have anyone telling them not to breed or the religious family with nineteen kids (my sister graduated with one and I graduated with one and they are still having babies) who just can't seem to stop procreating and really should.
I guess I just can't help but hope for the best for kids. I'm a half-glass-full kinda girl. I want to imagine every child born as being born to someone who wants the very best for them and goes about it to the best of their parenting ability. Sometimes it's naive.
As for rights, I guess it's how you view it. I personally believe I have certain rights and I don't necessarily bend to laws concerning them. I don't agree with everything the government has deemed permissable and non-permissable, generally in areas concerning what I can and cannot do with my own body.
There are probably two ways of looking at the rights issue. Either you have no rights at all, or you have the right to do anything you please. After all you are ultimately responsible for your own actions.
However there is another issue and thats what you have rights to. that is usually determined by society and again they are not rights as in permanently unchangeable rights (which is how most people perceive the word rights in this context). Thats why I prefer the term privileges granted by government.
And Yes it would be nice if many people actually had better reasons than free housing and social security for having children like in the UK, OR even worse, here in Mexico its, "don't use birth control because you must accept the children God sends you" which leads a great deal of kids living on the edge of starvation in abject poverty. Way to go Mr. Pope!