The question for this is simple.  Do we all just agree to not go there and hangout?

I personally think it to be an absurd notion.  Anyone else care to weigh in?  Looking for another view point on this, if there is one at all.

The link to the article is listed below. (Don't worry, it's a quick read)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/25/atheists-temple_n_1231848....

Views: 151

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Someone emailed Alan De Botton about this and he is doing "no such thing"

This idea of a Temple fuels the erroneous notion of believers that Atheism, Humanism, and Science are just other forms of belief, no different than their own.

A profoundly bad idea.  

--Gideon

[I've read elsewhere AND here that de Botton is not actually doing this. That's immaterial. The point is it CAN be done, there are already websites declaring churches of atheism. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.]

It is an absurd notion. Being an absurdist, I applaud it. Not because I think it's a good idea, but because this reinforces my insistance that IF there is anything to believe in this universe, it's that absurdity is the only true reality. 

But then, many things already show the absurdity of belief, like In God We Trust on american money for example, or people believing a god would tell them to destroy other ppl (his alleged creation) for any reason, or depictions of jesus on the cross all over the place while muhammad is actively not visibly depicted (but every other muslim couple names their child muhammad). That's just a few examples of the absurdity in religion. 

Tomatoes are a fruit. Really. Need I go on? 

So temples for worshiping atheism? Only stands to reason, in an absurd universe with an even more absurd humanity observing it. You already have rallies for reason. You are already scheduling monthly meetings and annual pilgrimages. Why not erect a physical structure dedicated to these things? And don't forget the offering plates. You'll need to pay for the utilities and upkeep of the grounds. 

Maybe the Believers were right. Atheism has always been a religion. At any rate, I'm out. I gotta be an anti-theist until someone figures out how to turn that into a religion too and then I'll move on to something else. You guys just became the enemy. So long as one person somewhere still insists on believing something, religion will remain a virus in the global consciousness of mankind. I hope you enjoy yourselves in your fellowship. Just please remember it's okay to dance, no matter what the baptists say. 

If it were being done, it'd be pretty pointless.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/authorinterviews/9045391/A...

Here is another article that portrays it as more a museum thing to rally around rather than a temple.  Atheism does need to spawn a central ideology though.  Education ought to be lifelong as well.  School doesn't teach enough and there ought to be optional academies (drawing from the greek concept) in the places of churches that can be attended at weekly intervals as most people have busy schedules.  They wouldn't need to do anything other than learn and socialize there.

Atheists need to have an identity because the lack of belief places them in a different category with the rest of society and in a sense isolated.  Rallying around a recognizable ideology would foster integration with society on a more efficient level.

Atheism already has temples. They're called Libraries :-)

This. XD

RSS

Forum

hebrew bullshit

Started by seamus mc ardle in Small Talk. Last reply by Gregg RThomas 4 hours ago. 2 Replies

Does Human Nature Change?

Started by Tom Sarbeck in Philosophy. Last reply by Unseen 7 hours ago. 5 Replies

Sharia Law is a reality

Started by David Boots in Small Talk. Last reply by Jake LaFort on Thursday. 6 Replies

Blog Posts

Leo - the lion

Posted by Brad Snowder on April 23, 2017 at 1:25am 0 Comments

When did this happen?

Posted by Ron Humphrey on April 17, 2017 at 4:24am 1 Comment

© 2017   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service