***[Moderator Note] Pahu is no longer a member of Think Atheist.  If you would like to add your thoughts to this thread, that is your prerogative; however, the original poster is not able to respond.[/Moderator Note]***

When we set out to explain why and how something happens, we must use the evidence, facts and experience available to us if we are to arrive at a logical conclusion. Using available evidence, experience, facts, observation and experimentation, we know that the universe had a beginning and that before that beginning there was no universe and therefore there was nothing. We know this because of the Law of Causality (for every cause there is an effect and for every effect there is a cause). Based on this law, we can use the following logic:

 

1. The universe exists.

2. The universe had a beginning.

3. Before the beginning of the universe, there was no universe.

4. Since there was no universe, there was nothing.

5. Since the universe does exist, it came from nothing.

6. Nothing comes from nothing by any natural cause.

7. Therefore the cause of the universe is supernatural.

8. Life exists.

9. Life always comes from pre-existing life of the same kind (the Law of Biogenesis).

10. Life cannot come from nonliving matter by any natural cause.

11. Since life does exist, the cause of life is supernatural.

 

Many people with a naturalistic worldview assume everything can be explained by natural causes. From the beginning, they reject the possibility of a supernatural cause. Because of this they are left with no scientifically valid answers to the question of how the universe could come from nothing, which is impossible by any natural cause of which we are aware. Many answers have been proposed that go beyond the realm of known evidence, experience, facts, observation and experimentation and therefore enter the realm of fiction.

 

The same logic applies to life. Using available evidence, experience, facts, observation and experimentation, we know that life only comes from pre-existing life of the same kind.

 

[color=blue][i]“Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. All observations have shown that life comes only from life. This has been observed so consistently it is called the Law of Biogenesis. Evolution conflicts with this scientific law by claiming that life came from nonliving matter through natural processes”[/color][/i] [[url=http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/]From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown[/url]]

 

Life never comes from non-living matter by any natural cause of which we are aware.

 

Now that we have seen proof that God exists, using logic based on known evidence, experience, facts, observation and experimentation, we need to see if He has revealed Himself to us. In the Holy Bible there are hundreds of prophecies given by God who is speaking in the first person. In both Bible and secular history we find that those prophecies have been accurately fulfilled. No other writing on earth comes close to doing this! Only God can accurately reveal the future, ergo, He is the author of the Holy Bible. Within the pages of the Holy Bible He reveals His nature, our nature, His relationship to us, our need for salvation and His plan of salvation for us.

 

The reason the universe and life cannot come from nothing by any natural cause, but can come from a supernatural cause is because God is the self-existent creator of everything and everyone. He is not subject to His creation. He created it and sustains it. It is a mistake to judge God by human standards and human perspectives. God reveals that He is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent.

 

If you are interested in more detailed proof, read, [i]“Evidence that Demands a Verdict”[/i] by Josh McDowell.

 

[[url=http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000005147#] From “Reincarnation in the Bible?” [/url]]

 

Views: 5060

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Appalled is an understatement, Steve has the sect of history correct, why would any secular, atheist, humanist etc... no be appalled?  Look at the history of all the so called religious prophets:  Look at the similarities, Coincidence? o.k. its you who subscribes to this BS 

Hebrew book of Fables says in the asinine book of Genesis that on the 1st day god created light, good job I guess the Sun didn't produce light for 3 days since he created the Sun on the 4th day!  In Exodus 20:2-3 the 1st commandment god tells moses “You shall have no other gods before Me.” which I take to mean 2 things gods is plural, so even god thinks there are other gods, and 2nd that god is a jealous  narcissistic SOB! All these different religions with the same damn text can't agree on anything! History shows god has had many sons where are all of them now? which ones should we care about, fucking amazing they are all born on December 25th, ig:

 

Phrygian born of a virgin Dec. 25th, a savior, his body used as bread and eaten by worshipers, Black Friday crucified on a tree, and resurrected on March 25th

 

Buddha was also born of a virgin on Dec. 25th was attended by a "Star of Announcement" with wise men and angels, on his bday was pronounced ruler of the world, given jewels and other precious substances, he also like Jesus crushed a serpents head, he was tempted by Mara the "Evil One" when fasting, he was baptized in H2O with the "spirit of god" and "holy ghost" present, he performed miracles, healed the sick, and walked on water, he preached righteousness and his followers took vows of poverty, he was transfigured on a mount, died on a cross, was resurrected, his covering unrolled from his body and his tomb opened by supernatural powers, he ascended into heaven, he was called lord, master, light of the world, god of gods, almighty, redeemer of all, omnipotent, eternal one etc...

he was considered the good shepherd and the carpenter and he is to return to judge the dead.  this all happened 500 years before Christ from christianity

 

Dionysus also born on Dec 25th of a virgin and the holy child, also traveled as a teacher performing miracles, he was a sacred king killed and eaten as an eucharistic ritual, he also rose from the dead on March 25th, he turned water into wine, called king of kings & god of gods, he was considered the one begotten son, savior redeemer, from the center of Jerusalem and was worshiped by the Jews.

 

Hercules born of a virgin, also know as only begotten he was sacrificed on the spring equinox Easter, and born on the winter solstice Christmas

 

Osiris which contributed to more of christianity than anyone wants to admit, he had over 200 divine names, he suffered died and also rose again and reigned eternally in heaven, his flesh was also eaten, Psalm 23 in the hebrew book of fables most likely came from Osiris' deeds.  Ironically the teachings of jesus and Osiris are almost identical. 

Horus or Osiris's son, also born on Dec 25th of a virgin, his birth being announced by a star in the east and attended by 3 wise men, his earthly father was Joseph, at age 12 he was a teacher, and age 30 was baptized, just like Jesus we lost track of those 18 FUCKING years!!! baptized by Anup the baptizer or John the baptist, wow amazing he had 12 disciples, he performed miracles too, he also walked on water, was called holy child, he was transfigured on the mount, was crucified between two thieves, buried for 3 days and also resurrected. He was called messiah, son of man, good shepherd, god's annointed son, etc....

 

Krishna also born of a virgin on Dec 25th the divine one, father a carpenter, birth was signaled by a star in the east and attended by angels and presented with spices, was persecuted a tyrant, healed people, depicted of having his foot on the head of a serpent, he worked miracles and wonders, raising the dead and healing lepers,the deaf and blind, preached about charity and love, and lived poor life, he had disciples, favorite was John, he was transfigured in front of his disciples, he gave his disciples ability to work miracles, he died on a tree, crucified between 2 thieves, he rose from the dead, ascended into heaven at the age of around 30! Depicted on cross with nail holes in feet as well as having heart emblem on his clothing, he was called Shepherd God, redeemer, first born, was deemed the son of god and our lord and savior who came to earth to die for our salvation, he was the 2nd person of the trinity, his disciples bestowed upon him the title of Jezeus meaning pure essence, and he is to return to judge the dead riding on a white horse to do battle with the prince of evil will desolate the earth.  This is recorded back in 800BCE hmmm way before Christ/.Jesus wtf ever you want to call him. 

 

Mithra lets go way back now, and ancient god found both in Persia and India and predates christianity by thousands of years.  Pagan religion of the era.  It is one of the oldest religious systems on earth, but it seems to be the greatest challenge to christianity, born on Dec. 25th of virgin birth in a cave, and attended by shepherds bearing gifts, he was considered traveling teacher and master, he had 12 disciples, his followers promised immortality, he performed miracles, sacrificed himself for world peace, was buried in a tomb after 3 days rose from the dead, his resurrection was celebrated every year, was called good shepherd, savior, messiah, his sacred day was Sunday, the lords day, hundreds of years before christ, Mithra has a principle festival on what is now easter, his religion had a eucharist or lords supper of which Mithra said "He who shall not eat of my body nor drink of my blood so that he may be one with me and I with him, shall not be saved"  his annual sacrifice is the passover of the Magi, a symbolic atonement or pledge of moral and physical regeneration.  Further more the Vatican itself is built upon the papacy of Mithra and the christian hierarchy is nearly identical to the Mithriac version it replaced, Paul of christianity (1 Cor. 10:4) "They drank from that spiritual rock and that rock was christ" this is identical to the Mithraic scriptures  except the name Mithra was replaced with christ.  The vatican hill in rome that is regarded sacred to Peter, the christian rock, was already sacred Mithra and many Mithraic remains have been found there.  The Fact that legendary home of Paul, Taurus, was the site of Mithra worship.  The Catholic Encyclopedia states "The fathers conducted the worship. The Chief of the fathers, a sort of pope who always lived at Rome, was called Pater Patratus"  The Mithraic pope was called Papa or Pontimus Maximus. 

 

I could keep going on and on and on about all the saviors of religions, that all resemble each other, there are a plethora of writings of over 35 that are nearly identical to christ.  Astrology plays an important piece in the fucked up puzzle of lies, myths and miracles, of modern christianity, the astrological symbols and zodiacs alone plastered all over many cathedrals and churches, take Norte Dame in Paris for instance.  I can write all day about magical flying monkey in the sky!

 

So I am sick of hearing about religions there are ZERO FACTS! Just a mythological bunch of BS just look at the similarities and there are plenty more to choose from! Keep your faith away from education, science and history, all you religious nut jobs need to think for yourself, read the atrocities of the bible, and intelligibly think about morals, because they logically cannot ever come from the bible! Do you actually believe everything you hear? So it seems that all religions of the world preach the same BS and everyone seems just to believe because of faith or just ignorance, or maybe because they placed fear into you! Like they know anything that happens to you when you die? Right?  We can leave the "FREEWILL" & the "SOUL" for another time, but since if you think you have one maybe your human life isn't as valuable as every other living thing on earth since christians think only humans have souls and can have an eternal life, so to me that gives more rights to ANIMALS than to humans since they don't have souls they won't got to your mythological heaven, and you will in your belief system so they have more of a right to live a happier life on earth than YOU!

These are just some examples of how idiotic religions are and why they should not interfere with politics science and with how I live my life! 

I am my own God & Christ is the other white meat! 

Now I can go have my dinner! 

I agree with the bolth of you. Steve and you. I was mearly attempting to come to neutral ground. I don't feel being a dick to those that think different than me get's any point accrose. I agree that attempting to evangelise on an Atheist site is counter productive as well, but we can at least not degrade, and respect a human. I am an atheist, however coming after me for this is also counter productive. I respect everyone. When I take offense is when basic rights are subjectified to religeous dogma. we are in agreement here.

Jesus was not born on December 25 nor do Jew celebrate birthdays.

So much paganism has been mixed with the faith, including the Asiatic Trinity courtesy of Bishop Athanasius of Antioch in the fourth Century. Paganism propelled by the the Pagan emperor Constantine, the defender of the NIcene Creed. The enemy of the truth and why Christianity as it is known is failure today.

members of his body?  That is disgusting.
Poe's law at work I hope...

I guess the Endosymbiotic Theory should all be disregarded as well, again it is a theory, a well documented theory that has been accepted, oh except for those who think religion is a theory!  Like I said no Logic and no Reason! Humans have a Primal need to believe god exists? Must be some new unproven theory that religion has concocted? Again with zero empirical data to back that statement up!  

I want to know why one would want to accept the god of the old testament  he is the most unpleasant character in all fiction, jealous and proud of it, a petty, unjust, unforgiven, control freak, a vindictive, blood thirsty ethnic cleanser, a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously manevolent bully but yet you believe and have faith in this, and think that he actually wrote this mythological book of fables?  Seriously your pineal gland is releasing dimethyltryptamine because these are some serious delusions! 

dimethyl

well put scotty!! and jesus claimed that he and the father were one, so he must be as miserable as the old testament god... now about this ghost figure...
Jesus loves you, Pahu. ***moderator's edit***

   Sorry, science does NOT prove God. In fact, scientists are making great headway in proving the non-necessity of any kind of supernatural intervention to explain the universe and life.  Most of your postulates can be shown to be faulty; but let me address just one: the so-called "Law of Biogenesis."  Most biologists no longer regard that as an inviolate law, just because Louis Pasteur used it to support his germ theory.  They are increasingly focused these days on "abiogenesis."

   My guess, since you clearly have no background in science, is that you don't know what abiogeneisis is.  It is the rapidly developing concept that life CAN and probably DID arise from non-life.  Have you heard of "probionts"?  I doubt it.  They are chemical entities that are showing promise as precursors of prokaryotes, which were probably the first forms of life.  Beginning with the groundbreaking Urey-Miller experiment a half century ago, scientists have been producing a variety of prebiotics that may very well be similar to those that were stewed in the early organic soup on earth.  

One example: crystals, such as snowflakes, have the remarkable ability to self-organize in a manner that is little different from what we identify as the life process.  They don't organize into six-pointed crystals by chance; something basic is driving them.  We don't yet know that that force is, but no serious scientist thinks it's the work of a Supreme Deity.  Numerous experiments are going on right now in which the chemical consituents of life are synthesized to the point of self-replicating.  So far, none of them have persisted for long, which is probably what happened in Earth's early existence, as well, until evolution took over by applying its amazing tool: DNA.  One of the many hypotheses being explored is that life originated from clay crystals, of all things.  It is true that, so far, no unambiguous life form has been produced.  However, thousands of scientists are working on it because they believe in the possibility - the probability - that life began as a result of sophisticated self-organization among certain complex molecules.  

   The point I'm making is not that life definitely did arise from non-life, as I believe, but that your assertion that science has proved otherwise is, at best, premature.  Real scientists are working hard on it for the simple reason that they have NOT proved God.  And YOU certainly haven't!  You accept some amorphous, indescribable, unlocatable, magical god as an explanation for everything simply because you can't imagine anything else; but scientists can, and do.  Incidentally, your God, you say, is both omniscient and omnipotent.  Then He must NOT be omnibenevolent, since he KNOWS, a priori, about all the disasters that befall human beings, and chooses not to prevent them.  And don't give me that "free will" crap.  Children don't choose to die horrible deaths.  Your God chooses to make them suffer for reasons of His own. 

   One more thing: any pretense to be appealing on scientific grounds to the existence of God is totally discredited when you cite the Bible as an authority rather than any scientific texts.  And the idea that the Bible prophecies have come true is preposterous.  I've read the Bible, cover-to-cover, and haven't come across any prediction of future events that ever came true except in some highly tortuous and imaginative rationalizations by science-deniers like yourself.  By the way, the earth is not flat, despite what your Bible says.   

 

   My guess, since you clearly have no background in science, is that you don't know what abiogeneisis is.  It is the rapidly developing concept that life CAN and probably DID arise from non-life.  Have you heard of "probionts"?  I doubt it.  They are chemical entities that are showing promise as precursors of prokaryotes, which were probably the first forms of life.  Beginning with the groundbreaking Urey-Miller experiment a half century ago, scientists have been producing a variety of prebiotics that may very well be similar to those that were stewed in the early organic soup on earth.  

 

Pahu: The experiments by Harold Urey and Stanley Miller, conducted in 1953, are often mentioned as showing that the “building blocks of life” can be produced in the laboratory. Not mentioned in these misleading claims are:

 

1) These “building blocks” are merely the simpler amino acids. The most complex amino acids have never been produced in the laboratory.

2) Most products of these chemical reactions are poisonous to life.

3) Amino acids are as far from a living cell as bricks are from the Empire State Building.

4) Half the amino acids produced have the wrong handedness. 

5) Urey and Miller’s experiments contained a reducing atmosphere, which the early earth did not have, and components, such as a trap, that do not exist in nature. (A trap quickly removes chemical products from the destructive energy sources that make the products.)

 

In fact, most of what was produced in the Miller-Urey experiments was a sludge of simple organic chemicals that are not found in living organisms. Only about 2% was amino acids. Of this 2%, 95% was the simplest amino acid of all, glycine.

 

Chemist Robert Shapiro describes the widespread current acceptance of the results of Miller and Urey's experiments as “mythology rather than science.”

 

Oxygen is deadly to the Miller-Urey experiments: the 'building blocks of life' simply would not have formed in an oxygen-rich atmosphere. Oxygen reacts with methane to form carbon dioxide and water, and with ammonia to form nitrogen oxides and water. If you introduce oxygen into the apparatus, along with methane and hydrogen, and then put a spark through it, you do not get amino acids: you get an explosion.

 

But scientists still often claim that the atmosphere of the early Earth did not contain oxygen. When asked why, they reply that oxygen-less conditions are needed for life to develop. Now, call me naive, but in any other circumstances I think we would say this was arguing in a circle.

 

“All nucleotides synthesized biologically today are righthanded. Yet on the primitive earth, equal numbers of right- and left-handed nucleotides would have been present. When we put equal numbers of both kinds of nucleotides in our reaction mixtures, copying was inhibited.” Leslie E. Orgel, “The Origin of Life on the Earth,” Scientific American, Vol. 271, October 1994, p. 82.

 

“Many researchers have attempted to find plausible natural conditions under which [left-handed] L-amino acids would preferentially accumulate over their [right-handed] D-counterparts, but all such attempts have failed. Until this crucial problem is solved, no one can say that we have found a naturalistic explanation for the origin of life. Instead, these isomer preferences point to biochemical creation.”  Kenyon, p. A-23.

 

All of the above show why intelligence and design are necessary to produce even the simplest components of life.

 

Dale Headley: ...crystals, such as snowflakes, have the remarkable ability to self-organize in a manner that is little different from what we identify as the life process.  They don't organize into six-pointed crystals by chance; something basic is driving them.  We don't yet know that that force is, but no serious scientist thinks it's the work of a Supreme Deity.  Numerous experiments are going on right now in which the chemical consituents of life are synthesized to the point of self-replicating.  So far, none of them have persisted for long, which is probably what happened in Earth's early existence, as well, until evolution took over by applying its amazing tool: DNA.  One of the many hypotheses being explored is that life originated from clay crystals, of all things.  It is true that, so far, no unambiguous life form has been produced.  However, thousands of scientists are working on it because they believe in the possibility - the probability - that life began as a result of sophisticated self-organization among certain complex molecules.  

 

Pahu: 

The “order” found in a snowflake or a crystal has nothing to do with increased information, organization or complexity, or available energy (i.e., reduced entropy).  The formation of molecules or atoms into geometric patterns such as snowflakes or crystals reflects movement towards equilibrium—a lower energy level, and a more stable arrangement of the molecules or atoms into simple, uniform, repeating structures with minimal complexity, and no function.  These are not examples of matter forming itself into more organized or more complex structures or systems (as postulated in evolutionist theory), even though they may certainly reflect “order” in the form of simple patterns.

For more information go here.

 

Dale Headley:   The point I'm making is not that life definitely did arise from non-life, as I believe, but that your assertion that science has proved otherwise is, at best, premature.  Real scientists are working hard on it for the simple reason that they have NOT proved God.  And YOU certainly haven't!  You accept some amorphous, indescribable, unlocatable, magical god as an explanation for everything simply because you can't imagine anything else; but scientists can, and do.  Incidentally, your God, you say, is both omniscient and omnipotent.  Then He must NOT be omnibenevolent, since he KNOWS, a priori, about all the disasters that befall human beings, and chooses not to prevent them.  And don't give me that "free will" crap.  Children don't choose to die horrible deaths.  Your God chooses to make them suffer for reasons of His own. 

One more thing: any pretense to be appealing on scientific grounds to the existence of God is totally discredited when you cite the Bible as an authority rather than any scientific texts.  And the idea that the Bible prophecies have come true is preposterous.  I've read the Bible, cover-to-cover, and haven't come across any prediction of future events that ever came true except in some highly tortuous and imaginative rationalizations by science-deniers like yourself.  By the way, the earth is not flat, despite what your Bible says.

 

Pahu: Your understanding of the Holy Bible is pathetically erroneous. For a more accurate understanding, go here:

Bible Answers

Bible Archaeology

Bible Christian Answers

Bible Commentaries

Bible Contradictions Answered

Bible Creation Proof

Bible Explained

Bible Prophecies 1

Bible Prophecies 2

Bible Prophecies 3

Bible Prophecies 4

Bible Prophecies 5

 

 

Why does God have to be magical. A magical God is never the ascertain of Christianity.

But rather an all powerful God that does things with his wisdom and understanding.

Read the book of Job and get the truth along with it's pageantry. God is non baryonic and fills the universe with his presence. But that does not make him magical. In fact the universe is not big enough to fully  contain him. He is" the awe and mystery that reaches from the inner mind to the Outer Limits" 

People wonder why Atheists are so sick of dealing with the religious nuts who have an irrational need to tell us about their god and rationalize every bit of stupidity they find in the bible. Not content to waste their own time they have to waste mine as well. The above makes no sense to a thinking person who can only shake his head and ask "Does the phrase I don't know scare you so much that you have to make up gods to keep the phrase at bay? What is so bad about not knowing everything?"

When I say I don't know then it is a start of a quest for knowledge. When you say god did it you only give up on looking and not content to live in ignorance alone you simply have to convince others to fear "I don't know". I don't fear it because when I can't say I don't know then there is nothing left to learn and that would be a sad day for me.

I feel very sorry for you Pahu, because you have traded a search for knowledge for the spreading of ignorance. You came here and proudly stated "I know so you fools can stop looking" in the hope that you could convince others to stop thinking.

RSS

Forum

Dr. Oz finally getting his due

Started by Unseen in Small Talk. Last reply by Davis Goodman 2 hours ago. 4 Replies

Books to read in 2015

Started by Belle Rose in Advice. Last reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer 6 hours ago. 8 Replies

Skepticon (Or Other Atheist Type of Events)

Started by Peter in Small Talk. Last reply by Belle Rose 2 hours ago. 1 Reply

Another philosophical question...

Started by Belle Rose in Ethics & Morals. Last reply by Davis Goodman 1 hour ago. 18 Replies

Events

Blog Posts

It's all Greek to me

Posted by Simon Mathews on April 15, 2015 at 4:14am 15 Comments

Free at last

Posted by Belle Rose on April 15, 2015 at 1:00am 2 Comments

Services we love!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2015   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service