Can someone help me out here?

Which logical fallacy would the following fall under......

The spirit of the second amendment was for people to have muskets not machine guns.

Well the spirit of the first amendment was for newspaper not the internet. In both cases they do the same as the original, just faster and better.

Views: 116

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm not entirely certain that it is a fallacy, though I suppose you could say it is false equivalence. Don't say that though, because I haven't really thought it through; I'm just bored.

The second amendment references 'arms' which are tools. The particular tools defined as 'arms' at the time the Constitution was written are scarcely in use anymore. 'The Press', on the other hand, can refer literally to printing presses, and also to the publishing houses themselves. In the former definition the analogy is very crude, but it still stands (more or less). In the latter definition, it is referring to institutions which still stand in a very similar fashion today. Even if the technology and medium has changed, the freedom those institutions are guaranteed under the Constitution should still stand.

I don't think either statement from the original post is all that useful though. I'm sure there have been court rulings on how the definitions of 'arms' and 'press' should be applied to the Constitution in modern times. If anything, both lines argue that there are limits to the relevance of the perspectives of the framers of the Constitution to modern times. I think the analogy is bad, but the point behind it is valid. 

The spirit of the second amendment was for people to have muskets not machine guns. Well the spirit of the first amendment was for newspaper not the internet. In both cases they do the same as the original, just faster and better.

The logical fallacy in this case is a false comparison between newspapers and muskets. 

You are assuming that there is indeed a logical fallacy, just to prove a point. You "know" there's a fallacy, you're just not sure what it is. What you're doing is a logical fallacy in itself. You're doing the same as the theists that "know" there's a god, but are trying to find an excuse/justification for XYZ, just to make their beliefs "fit".

RSS

Support T|A

Think Atheist is 100% member supported

All proceeds go to keeping Think Atheist online.

Donate with Dogecoin

Members

Forum

Science Isn't About Truth

Started by Ari E. S. in Philosophy. Last reply by Simon Paynton 1 hour ago. 8 Replies

Blog Posts

Dead man's Switch

Posted by Philip Jarrett on April 18, 2014 at 11:29pm 0 Comments

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Into life hacks? Check out LabMinions.com

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service