I'm an atheist. I believe in reproductive rights for women. I believe a woman should be able to abort a pregnancy no questions asked. Why should I have to also believe the nonsense that "life begins at birth"? It seems to me that a human being is created as soon as a sperm fertilizes an egg. The DNA of a human being exists from that point onward. Are we so under the thumbs of the religious right that we can't say, "Yeah, life begins at conception. So what? The woman still has control."?

Tags: abortion, conception, feminism

Views: 1852

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

But isn't an embryo a "stage in the life cycle" and is therefor alive? What is the status of an unborn alligator, then, or a tomato sprout which hasn't quite broken through to sunlight yet? Dead?

I think you need to define what you mean by 'alive'. A sperm cell is alive, an egg is alive, they merge to form a new cell which is also alive. Life has been non-stop for billions of years.

You're absolutely right. It's false to claim that even a pre-embryonic sperm and egg aren't "alive." The difference is that once a sperm fertilizes an egg, the life of an individual being begins.

And that is the point where the discussion needs to take place. At what point does a group of cells make the shift from something that is alive to a sentient being. If a fertilized egg fails to implant into the womb, we don't consider that to be the death of an individual.

It sure is. It's just a nameless individual we'll never get to know. Genetically, it's an individual. The sentience discussion may have bearing on personhood, but not on whether the embryo is alive.

You have a strange definition of individual, if you are only considering genetic data. Identical twins are genetically identical, yet I doubt you would claim that they are not two seperate individuals.

Life is a label we put on consciousness to be able to feel good about ourselves.  In the long run of things, we are mere specks of dust floating in space that had just the right influence on our chemistry to spawn evolution and countless species to thrive on our planet.  Ultimately this is a choice that should be left to the women.  NOBODY should be able to tell people what to do with their bodies, especially the government.

Babies aren't self sustaining any more than an unborn fetus.  In fact, most people aren't self sustaining until they are well into their teens, some earlier, some later.

 

Just thought I'd point that out.  :D

Maybe life begins when one gets one's first job. :)

People of all ages are dependent. Independence can't be an essential ingredient of life. Parasites are dependent but alive, after all.

This is true that parasites are alive.

 

But babies and young children really wouldn't survive without another person helping them.  I was really just putting that out there because someone earlier said something about a person being self sustaining at birth.

 

I'm really mixed on the abortion issue....I hate the idea of it, because it does seem that there is life in the womb, but I do realize that each situation is unique and there are very good reasons for having them.

 

I guess where I stand is, I don't judge a person if they have an abortion.  But it makes me sad nonetheless.  Both for the woman and the unborn.  Only because it's my understanding that many women suffer from depression and guilt and other issues after the fact...but if a woman has an abortion and doesn't suffer from it, then that's fine I guess, and I'm glad she doesn't.

 

My own mother had an abortion about 10 years ago, because she found she had kidney cancer and had to have a kidney removed.  The baby wouldn't have survived anyway, so she had it aborted.  I know it haunts her to this day, even though it's something she needed to do.  And she isn't a Christian.  But it's been tough for her.

 

But I know that many women have abortions and are fine.  However, many are not.  It's a very complicated issue.

If you read my original post, you'll know I'm for full reproductive rights for women. I also think it's a tactical lie to maintain the "life begins at birth." Babies aren't parasites because they belong in the womb and aren't invaders attempting to suck life from the mother without being detected.

Yeah, I read the original post.  Sorry, I go off on tangents.

 

I know that most people in the world have this issue figured out....but I don't.  I see it as a very touchy, very vulnerable subject that may or may not have a definitive answer.  But I do agree with you that life begins before birth.  I just don't know how much life, and how much control we should have over that life.  *shrug*

RSS

Blog Posts

My Dad and the Communist Spies

Posted by Brad Snowder on August 20, 2014 at 2:39pm 2 Comments

Breaking Free

Posted by A. T. Heist on August 20, 2014 at 9:56am 5 Comments

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service