Is the neutral verdict on the existence of God being maintain by God?
Truth is, if there was solid evidence for the existence of God, it then would be a point of fact with no room for faith.
Therefore is it possible that the continued neutrality is being sustain by God for our benefit?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on -
Color me curious Reg, but is there a Fronkey god?
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx
www.in-His-own-image.com
-
Permalink Reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer on -
Check out the color of this Archaeopteryx. Sometimes they act like they are gods but I am the Fronkey farmer, a man outstanding in his own field. At least this picture is evidence for their existence. I once had some baptists convinced that I created them in a lab when I was playing god. I wonder what they will evolve into?? LOL.
Michael - Sorry for the mini hijack.
-
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on
-
Michael - not in the least sorry for the mini-hijack --
Reg - guess you're not familiar with the famous Texas Jackalope?
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx
www.in-His-own-image.com
-
Permalink Reply by Skycomet the Fallen Angel on -
Faith is used in the absence of evidence. IMO evidence-based belief is stronger than and superior to faith-based belief. I say "belief" to avoid confusion. I do not think that faith is a source of knowledge. I do not see any benefit... or any reason for that matter... for a god to keep him/herself cloaked in shadow perpetually. What possible benefit is lack of knowledge? In fact, I would argue that in some cases, faith-based belief can be harmful to an individual and society at large. I have found from personal experience and observation that there may be psychological harm in faith. See my old blog post "Chronic Guilt Disorder" http://www.thinkatheist.com/forum/topics/chronic-guilt-disorder-a
-
Permalink Reply by Michael on -
Your link collaborates my ascertain that 99.999 % of all religions including Christendom is false.
For all the drama queens and Mardi Gras revelers, you are turning your alleged religion into a lascivious and profane spectacle.
-
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on
-
And a wet bird never flies at night.
I'm curious Michael, exactly what are you smoking?
-
Permalink Reply by Suzanne Olson-Hyde on -
Yaayyyy for all lascivious and profane spectacles. Yaayy for Drama Queens, or queens of any sort really. Have you ever experienced lasciviousness - it really is such fun, and the people involved are brilliant and joyous and friendly.
You really should experience it. You don't know what you are missing, and therefore you are not making a knowledgeable and experiential comment.
So, next time time there is a lascivious party going, you can come with me :D
-
Permalink Reply by Suzanne Olson-Hyde on
-
Gee, Michael, just how many women are you seeing?
Temptress is my middle name.
-
Permalink Reply by Michael on
-
Wow, that's an invite, but my wife would knock me clear into next Tuesday.
LOL
-
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on
-
So, she and most of the rest of us have that desire in common --
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx
www.in-His-own-image.com
-
Permalink Reply by Suzanne Olson-Hyde on
-
Damn!
What's new today
Forum
Are people stupid?
Started by Elon Johnson in Miscellaneous Sciences. Last reply by Gallup's Mirror 4 minutes ago. 81 Replies 0 Likes
Blog Posts
SO A CHRISTIAN DOESN’T TOLERATE MY VIEWS…WHY BE SO ANNOYED?
Posted by Eljay on May 19, 2013 at 12:36pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Events
Services we love
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
