I meant to say, Griffins - my lightning-fast fingers got ahead of my brain.
Anybody here hold a "neutral verdict on the existence of God"?
I'm trying to figure out what a "neutral verdict" could be. Sounds rather oxymoronic doesn't it?
If that refers to someone rendered mentally retarded, due to oxygen deprivation, then I would have to say yes.
I just figure that the question is just about as important for by day to day existence as the age of the universe, Lilly Tomlin's birthday, and how many live young sow bugs have.
And of course I doubt God "maintain" [sic] it either, since the nonexistent cannot do shit.
Author Delos McKowan may have put it just a tad more eloquently, when he said, "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike."
Number One post again.....here we go....
No God! God exists!
[No evidence for 'god'] OK Suppression?/not available?
[Evidence for 'god'] Delusion?/bad data No Suppression/not yet convencing
Alternative No God! God exists!
[No evidence for 'god'] Atheists Right/Theists wrong Atheists Wrong/Theists Right
[Evidence for 'god'] Atheists Right/Theists Deluded Atheists Deluded/Theists Right
Just my funny attempt to get this stuff straight!