Discussions of justice tend to be very intellectual and high-minded. We think of it as one of the most important functions of The State.

However, famous civil rights attorney and law professor Avery Friedman, in commenting on the unexpected acquittal of Caylee Anthony for murdering her daughter, explained the decision by saying "Of course, another jury might have convicted her."

While it may seem obvious, I was floored. I actually hadn't really thought much about that before. Doesn't that comment by Prof. Friedman really mean that there really can be no such thing as justice? For if justice can't be counted on to be flawlessly consistent, is it justice at all or is it just a form of chance?

Views: 266

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Chance, no. Money, yes. Justice is available to the highest bidder - this country offers the best justice money can buy.

Spot on.

All money does is take the chance out of it, but in the direction of active abuse. Whether that's better or worse I'll leave to you.

In your will, I hope - can I count on that soon?

RSS

Forum

Private Eye Follows Priest

Started by JadeBlackOlive in Small Talk yesterday. 0 Replies

This topic again

Started by Unseen in Society. Last reply by Unseen 11 hours ago. 7 Replies

Are atheist a part of the collective consciousness?

Started by Ralph Burks in Small Talk. Last reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer 10 hours ago. 20 Replies

middle east

Started by Robert Genisis in Theistic Arguments and Debate Help. Last reply by SteveInCO 13 hours ago. 8 Replies

The Wisdom Of God

Started by Robert Genisis in Theistic Arguments and Debate Help. Last reply by Robert Genisis on Friday. 4 Replies

Events

Services we love!

© 2016   Created by umar.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service