The all-male Iowa Supreme Court said Friday that it would reconsider its 2012 ruling that a dentist acted legally when he fired an assistant that he found attractive simply because he and his wife viewed the woman as a threat to their marriage.
Melissa Nelson, who had sued the dentist for gender discrimination, had fought against the court’s decision.
"Not only does this breathe new life into her court case, it eliminates what many of us believed was a harmful legal and misguided precedent," her lawyer told ABC News.
A Des Moines lawyer with no role in the case told the network that the justices will likely issue a new opinion.
"There really is no reason to grant rehearing six months after the decision was made unless someone is seriously considering changing their mind," Ryan Koopmans, the lawyer, told ABC News. "I think we'll definitely see at least one opinion in favor of Melissa, the question is whether it is the majority opinion or dissenting opinion." (read more)
Whoa!, I'm not familiar with that one. Looked it up. She worked in a parlor that does Brazilian waxings which adds a dimension of ambiguity to it, in the way that a parlor specializing in hair coloration might require employees to allow their hair to be colored or a tattoo parlor might want employees to be willing to be tattooed. However, her role was as an esthetician, which usually means doing nails and facials and other things where she could keep her clothes on. I think she has a case.
Wow we are really getting down to nat's as-es....