Is atheism predicated partially on the belief in evolution and the current prevailing views of science.

If so, then such a belief is subject to drastic changes as discoveries and theories

 have recently arose that shatter the paradigm that is the foundation of such a belief:

Discoveries keep pushing back the inception of civilization, indefinitely back in time

Evidence of coastal civilizations existing during the ice age are arising in now inundated coastal region due to rising seas.

The concept of a missing link is no longer postulated as a bush of hominids lineages walked  the earth. With what was once considered ancestors, actually being contemporary with postulated descendants. A bush of hominids actually existed as recently as 30,0000 B.C.E.

Though theories of evolution abound no working scientific model exists for the emergence of life.

Our very existence is interwoven with the anthropic principle. As such this has required scientist to postulate the multiverse to explain how the anthropic principle is mindlessly satisfied by nature. However this just substitutes one unfalsifiable believe for another.

In truth, Darwin's world has been shattered and the truth has become intractable. Even as we cope with dark matter and energy. Terms that falsely connote that we have defined them, when in fact they are no more apparent than God. As such new scientific theories continue to emerge based on the inadequacy of the standard model. This will continue into infinitum since, as God there is no means to detect these alleged entities with scientific instrumentation.

Views: 4089

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm to busy head-desking to respond coherently... so I'll use this instead.

Cute Anime nonetheless.

@Michael the lunatic

So what then did the cosmo article have to do with your claims about the Kow Swamp people  - since it didn't mention them?  So what if another group of hominids went extinct - we know that many did.  How is this even intriguing in terms of evolution?  Where is the big conspiracy that you are claiming?

Heather, Ok, I will give some slack since you are not a scientist. If you read the thread above, I'm stating that basically Kow Swamp people break the paradigm that Homo Habilis existed only a million years ago and are the extinct ancestors of  Homo -Sapiens

I need not be a scientist to read the Cosmos article you cited and see that it does not mention the Kow Swamp people.  I need not be a scientist to google Kow Swamp people and find thousands of pages referencing the site - contrary to your claim that scientists are trying to sweep the find 'under the carpet'.  I need not be a scientist to see that updating the model of human evolution to account for new data is getting us no closer to your ancient tribal deity.

Now, what was it about the Kow Swamp people that you felt offered substantiation for the practice of pleasing a tribal god by burning animal carcasses?

Heather I am not reposting. I have already posted an article showing that Kow Swamp people clearly have Homo-Habilis traits. To date the scientific community has not seriously considered Kow Swamp people beyond the inadequate write-off one scientist. Kow Swamp people break the paradigm. No one will get his PhD adequately considering  these fossils. To date there are no plans to give Kow Swamp people their day in the Academic community. You do not have to be a scientist to know this either. Try to google how many papers address the Habilis attributes of the Kow Swamp people and you will arrive at a dearth of material.

You don't need to be a scientist to read all the articles stating that further research of the Kow Swamp remains is prohibited by treaty with the First Nations people of Australia.  So the fact that no one will get their PhD by desecrating protected remains is no surprise, dimwit.

Casts of the fossils are still in  the public domain. DNA sampling is of course  out reach. But remember this also happen in the States with Kennewick man, which also broke an established paradigm: 

Recently, a coalition of native tribes lost their claim to the remains of Kennewick Man, a 9,000-year-old skeleton found in Washington State. The case was won by a group of scientists who wanted access to the remains for study. Like Penon Woman, Kennewick Man is doliocephallic. George Gill, a forensic anthropologist at the University of Wyoming and one of the plaintiffs in the Kennewick Man case, said evidence indicated that seafaring people from southeast Asia or Polynesia could have reached the Americas by traveling along the Pacific Rim, landing somewhere in what is now South America. Gill also said an ancient European people could also have reached the northeast corner of North America.     So, as in the States, the case can be reopened.

Michael - one of the recursive symptoms of magical thinking is jumping from topic to topic each time the facts don't pan out.  You keep the rush going by just leaping over every obstacle to make new connections.  If you had something to say about the Kow People, then say it - otherwise admit you have no basis for objection with the research that has been done.

Before you move on to another study, either break free of the old one by admitting you were totally off base or specify the objection you had with it and stay on topic.  You claim to have a high IQ, a great deal of education, and a professional career - so I can only assume that you use a pseudonym here to avoid having colleagues find out just what kind of mumbo jumbo you waste your time peddling.

Not changing the subject, everyone else realizes that Heather. I assume you just want to be rhetorical

No, you are leaping from one failed attempt to the next.  Now admit your failure with these Kow Swamp people or state your point.  What is it about the Kow Swamp people that has brought about such a paradigm shift?  If the paradigm shift hasn't happened, then based on what peer reviewed research do you base your opinion that it should?

You've cited a Cosmos article that didn't even mention the Kow Swamp people, and further stated that there has been little to know research into the site - so where is this elusive evidence of yours?  Is it like your hypothesis about a Bronze Age tribal deity?  You base it all on unfounded faith?

RE: "Try to google how many papers address the Habilis attributes of the Kow Swamp people and you will arrive at a dearth of material."

I found one that linked them to homo erectus.

RSS

Forum

Dr. Oz finally getting his due

Started by Unseen in Small Talk. Last reply by Reg The Fronkey Farmer 1 hour ago. 2 Replies

Books to read in 2015

Started by Belle Rose in Advice. Last reply by Noel 5 hours ago. 5 Replies

Another philosophical question...

Started by Belle Rose in Ethics & Morals. Last reply by Simon Paynton 1 hour ago. 7 Replies

Events

Blog Posts

It's all Greek to me

Posted by Simon Mathews on April 15, 2015 at 4:14am 15 Comments

Free at last

Posted by Belle Rose on April 15, 2015 at 1:00am 2 Comments

Services we love!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2015   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service