Is atheism predicated partially on the belief in evolution and the current prevailing views of science.
If so, then such a belief is subject to drastic changes as discoveries and theories
have recently arose that shatter the paradigm that is the foundation of such a belief:
Discoveries keep pushing back the inception of civilization, indefinitely back in time
Evidence of coastal civilizations existing during the ice age are arising in now inundated coastal region due to rising seas.
The concept of a missing link is no longer postulated as a bush of hominids lineages walked the earth. With what was once considered ancestors, actually being contemporary with postulated descendants. A bush of hominids actually existed as recently as 30,0000 B.C.E.
Though theories of evolution abound no working scientific model exists for the emergence of life.
Our very existence is interwoven with the anthropic principle. As such this has required scientist to postulate the multiverse to explain how the anthropic principle is mindlessly satisfied by nature. However this just substitutes one unfalsifiable believe for another.
In truth, Darwin's world has been shattered and the truth has become intractable. Even as we cope with dark matter and energy. Terms that falsely connote that we have defined them, when in fact they are no more apparent than God. As such new scientific theories continue to emerge based on the inadequacy of the standard model. This will continue into infinitum since, as God there is no means to detect these alleged entities with scientific instrumentation.
So how many data points do you need to determine a 'signal', or to determine that another person is wacko?
I leave this an open question.
RE: "there is a giant standing image on Vatican hill, in St. Peters square. It will most certainly crack one day"
This man can predict entropy - truly a prophet!
If you are refering to the natural tendency of the Universe to lead to disorder, no. This will be a direct act of God and through his emmissaries "These shall hate the Woman and burn her flesh with fire, for God has put in their hearts to fulfill his will." She has burnt the Holy and Elect on Vatican Hill. And on the same hill and City (Babylon) shall she be burnt. Athema Marantha!
RE: "These shall hate the Woman and burn her flesh with fire" - Wow, rather stupid of him to create her in the first place, wasn't it?
Rather stupid of mankind to fall from grace, but that is water under the dam now.
Of all of the possible options available, who created a form of Mankind that could fall from grace?
You obviously won't listen to me when I tell you to seek medication so please listen to this instead; please print out your post here and take it to work (you claim to work in a mainstream work environment) and show it to your coworkers and ask them if they are uncomfortable hearing these ideas from you. If you won't undertake this, then it at least means you have enough insight to realize your ideas represent a significant deficit of sanity. If you do undertake this, realize that when your coworkers back away slowly it is because they believe you are truly insane and are unsure how to proceed.
Heather - are you sure they'll back away slowly? My guess is, they'll show him what the word, Exodus, REALLY means --
facepalm!! and how does this shit make us take anything you say seriously from this point on.... not that anyone actually stopped laughing as we read your drivel!!
Michael - here's another eerie statistic for you, that will make the very hairs on the back of your neck (and the palm of your hand) stand up! Did you know that 666 is 666 spelled backward?!!
Just remember the gainsaying of Korah and blasphemy of Simon the Magician. Every murmur will have to be acounted for on Judgement Day.
RE: "Every murmur will have to be acounted for" - Would the title of that be, Murmur He Wrote?