Irish Justice Minister plans referendum to scrap new blasphemy law

Atheist Ireland welcomes the statement from Dermot Ahern, the Irish Justice Minister, that he is proposing a referendum this Autumn to remove the offence of blasphemy from the Irish Constitution, along with two other referendums that the government is already committed to.


On January 1st, the day that the law became operational, Atheist Ireland had published 25 blasphemous statements  on the internet to challenge it. 


The Justice Minister has now told the Sunday Times that he was only doing his duty in bringing in the new blasphemy law, and that the Attorney General had advised him that it was mandatory. He added that “there was an incredibly sophisticated campaign [against me], mainly on the internet.”


Atheist Ireland would like to thank everybody who has helped to make this campaign so effective so far. We look forward to the Autumn referendum as part of our overall campaign for an ethical, secular Ireland. We ask all reasonable citizens to work together to ensure that the referendum is won.


We reiterate that this law is both silly and dangerous: silly because it is introducing medieval canon law offence into a modern plularist republic; and dangerous because it incentives religious outrage and because its wording has already been adopted by Islamic States as part of their campaign to make blasphemy a crime internationally.


The blasphemy reference is one of several anachronisms in our Constitution that will ultimately need to be changed. Other examples are the religious oaths that prevent atheists from becoming President, or a Judge, or a member of the Council of State.

Views: 0

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The reason for Autumn is that it can be held along with another referendum on the rights of children, to which the government was already committed, plus possibly three by-elections and a mayoral election in Dublin. That should mean a bigger turnout than for a referendum on just the blasphemy issue alone and also be more cost-effective than a standalone referendum.

And yes, the constitutionality of this particular blasphemy law could be challenged in the courts, but it would be cleaner to have the reference to blasphemy removed from the constitution altogether.

RSS

Partnering to raise money for cancer research with:

Hear our chat with philosopher of religion Dr. Stephen Maitzen on God's hiddenness, why there is something rather than nothing, and non-theistic meaning! Enjoy the show!

Cut back the TA email. Change it to a daily overview email! :]

In need of good gift ideas?

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.
Single? Atheist? Scientist? Check out:
CarbonDate.Me
Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

Events

© 2012   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service