Unfortunately, I'm going to declare my interpretation more valid than yours.
Haha, I'm ok with that, too!
Experience and expertise matters. Study matters. In all disciplines.
... and in all cons.
And NO, we have lots of scriptures in religion. Tens, hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of books. Why in the world would anyone think that only one could be true?
+1, the more differences in perspective, the better! (But not for science... it's a constant pruning process, with all that new growth. I mean jeez, it just never ends, does it?)
Well, I suppose, in that a con requires some experience in human psychology in order to manipulate behavior.
A con, however, is trying to get someone to accept a lack of expertise as somehow just as valid as an expert.
alright, ill do it when i get a chance.
your a site mod right? why dont you join the discusion?
whaaaaat, i dont interest you?
yeah, i live in idndonesia, and i only read your post at night, so it took me a while to change it.
Like I keep saying, everyone is an atheist, whether they realize it or not.
alright, i thought you were talking about the picture