All I can think of is:
"Its an argument from ignorance"
"Give me one logical reason why the universe needed a creator to exist?"
How would you debunk this argument?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Dennis donovan on February 9, 2012 at 11:05am Just ask questions that go above any christians heads. like why would god create quantum non locality? (I like to mess with their heads and through in feminine pronouns while describing "the creator") So why would she allow a patriarchal society for thousands of years? why do we have such a limited ability of sight? Sound? Why would god create a speed limit in the universe. Why would the universe be older than the bible says? you know stuff that angers them and frazzles there puny little unevolved lower ape brains. Maybe mention how they have puny unevolved lower ape brains
Permalink Reply by Heather Little on February 9, 2012 at 2:23pm
Permalink Reply by Helen Pluckrose on February 9, 2012 at 11:10am What do you think was god's motivation in creating a universe in which we, supposedly made in his image, cannot survive apart from on this planet (so far) which is 2/3rds water in which we cannot survive. Why would he have created so many animals of which he knew, being omnipotent, 99% would not survive? Why did he allow an asteroid to hit earth? What are all thedroughts, famine, floods, natural disaster, killer viruses, disease etc all about? Most people think God loves people - for you to suggest that he made the universe the way he did on purpose suggests he is, at best, indifferent to humanity, at worst malicious? What religion is that exactly?
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on February 9, 2012 at 11:51am Surely you know the stock, catch-all non-answer to that Helen, "The Lord works in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform --"![]()
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx
www.in-His-own-image.com
Permalink Reply by Helen Pluckrose on February 9, 2012 at 3:32pm *head explodes in frustration*
You are, of course, correct.
Permalink Reply by Robert Bumbalough on February 12, 2012 at 3:15pm Hello archaeopteryx. Yes your good point here belies an observation of how Abrahamic apologetics has morphed to strongly depend upon Presuppositionalism. Since all the classic arguments for a Platonic Supreme Being have been shown false or inconclusive, they must then assume the sale by making claims that naturalism cannot account for some aspect of human cognition. Logic, induction, morality, scientific reasoning being the usual suspects.
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on February 12, 2012 at 8:10pm Robert - RE: their assumption that "naturalism cannot account for some aspect of human cognition" - yet they somehow contend that Super-naturalism does --
pax vobiscum,
archaeopteryx
www.in-His-own-image.com
Permalink Reply by Heather Little on February 9, 2012 at 2:39pm
Permalink Reply by Helen Pluckrose on February 9, 2012 at 3:35pm Interesting. I just wrote a blog on the link between christianity and mental illness but did not consider the whole love and violence thing. Hmm?
Permalink Reply by Heather Little on February 9, 2012 at 7:55pm
Permalink Reply by Helen Pluckrose on February 10, 2012 at 4:43am Thanks - will have a look. :)
Started by Redlilly Pond in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by Ron Humphrey 1 minute ago. 25 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Teri G on May 24, 2013 at 2:29am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
