I saw this on yahoo news, it made me ask the question, has this come up in the US courts ? I am surprised by the UK courts ruling here.
your thoughts.
take care
A devout Hindu declared himself "overjoyed" on Wednesday after winning a court fight to be allowed to be cremated in Britain on an open-air funeral pyre. Skip related content
Spiritual healer Davender Ghai, 71, was granted his last wish by the Court of
Appeal which ruled the controversial ceremony could be carried out
without a change in the law.
But the judges ruled in his favour only after Ghai agreed that the pyre would be surrounded by walls and a
roof with an opening, the Press Association domestic news agency
reported.
Ghai believes that a pyre is essential to "a good death" and for the release of his spirit into the afterlife.
He wants a permit for an open-air cremation site in a remote part of Northumberland in northern England.
Ghai was originally refused permission by the local authority in Newcastle and lost a legal challenge to that decision at the High Court last May.
British law prohibits the burning of human remains anywhere outside a
crematorium and Newcastle council had further blocked his wish on the
grounds that it was impractical.
Jonathan Swift, representing the Ministry of Justice which opposed Ghai, said the law stipulated that
cremations must be within a building which in this case meant a
structure bounded by walls with a roof.
He said what Ghai was proposing did not comply with the law which was there to protect "decorum and decency."
But the appeal judges disagreed, saying the Cremation Act was in place to
ensure burnings were subject to uniform rules throughout the country
and executed in buildings which were appropriately equipped and away
from homes or roads.
The judges accepted Ghai was willing to be cremated within existing rules with his funeral pyre "enclosed in a
structure." They ruled the government's definition of a building was
too narrow.
The decision could now set a precedent for the 560,000 Hindus living in Britain. Hindu national organisations,
representing some 90 percent of Hindus in the UK, had backed the Ghai's
original High Court appeal.
Ghai said in a statement he was "overjoyed" by the ruling.
He added: "This case was truly a matter of life and death for me and today's verdict has breathed new life into an old man's dreams."
Tags:
Permalink Reply by a7 on February 17, 2010 at 7:48pm
Permalink Reply by Doug Reardon on February 17, 2010 at 9:33pm
Permalink Reply by elaine kilshaw on February 18, 2010 at 9:44am
Permalink Reply by elaine kilshaw on February 18, 2010 at 10:14am
Permalink Reply by a7 on February 18, 2010 at 7:10pm
Permalink Reply by elaine kilshaw on February 18, 2010 at 12:10pm
Permalink Reply by a7 on February 18, 2010 at 7:13pm
Permalink Reply by elaine kilshaw on February 19, 2010 at 5:16am
Permalink Reply by sukhdeep on February 18, 2010 at 10:06pm
Permalink Reply by sukhdeep on February 19, 2010 at 8:49am Started by tyler zborovancik in Advice. Last reply by Holo Gram 6 minutes ago. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Posted by Cathy Cooper on May 17, 2013 at 10:00am 3 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
