If you’re sexy and you know it, submit a photo to Think Atheist ASAP! We’re putting together a fund raising calendar for the website of our most lovely-looking ladies for 2010, and we need some steamy photos FAST. So if you’ve always wanted to be one of those lucky calendar girls, now’s your chance!

Here are the official rules:

1. NO NUDITY. This is very important and must be strictly adhered to. Be sexy and racy, but no full frontal nudity will be used in the calendar.

2. No full names will be put on the calendar to protect the privacy and safety of all the girls. Only a first name and the girl’s TA profile URL will be used. Girls may also choose to use a pseudonym for the calendar if they wish.

3. Girls may request a month to have their photo associated with, but we cannot guarantee that every girl will get the month they chose.

4. Submissions must be in by no later than December 17th, 2009 at 11:59 pm. We understand this is kind of soon, but we need to get the calendar done before the new year!

5. There are only 12 months, so only 12 girls will ultimately be chosen. All decisions are to be made by Think Atheist staff members and are final.

6. Only one photo submission per participant allowed. Choose it wisely!

To submit a photo, email it to thinkatheist@gmail.com as an attachment. Photos should be jpegs, in the biggest file size you can make. A suggested pixel size of twenty three hundred by eighteen hundred is recommended. Questions or comments? Drop us a line over at the forum:

We can’t wait to see what you guys send in! And as always, thanks for helping out the community here at Think Atheist.

Views: 4465

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

weird... I left a comment here yesterday and it seems to have ben deleted? I can't see it...
Wow, I've only been following this topic via twitter since I've lacked the concentration to go through it all and wow at the extreme reactions.
You know in some ways I can understand the extreme reactions either a.) gone way to over board on the feminism or b.) just think it's wrong to be sexy. Both are probably aftermaths of religion or other things.

I think guys and girls should take part (yes I know guys already have a calendar too let me finish) if you have the confidence - even if you just don't quite have the confidence, push yourself a little. Don't think your too fat or thin, or this that and the other. One cannot feel sexier than when they are happy with who they are (okay maybe some nice underwear helps!).
Yup, you don't have to be showing the nice underwear.
I don't get how any reason could be behind the reactions either. If women want to send in sexy pictures by their own free will then let them express their sexual freedom. It's not anti-feminist to celebrate the female form. I think some 'uber-feminists' forget that feminism is about equal rights (for everyone) and not about suppressing male and female sexuality.

Anyway, I could be wrong, but I will be surprised if there are a ton of pictures submitted of women in sexy underware. Most will probably be submitting fully clothed images in which they just look good. Sometimes being clothed is sexier than almost naked anyway.
I have never had an underwear shoot that didn't have many pictures of lace riding up in places it shouldn't (and not in the sexy way, either.)
I warn all underwear-y types, that it's going to take a whole load of double sided tape.
Also, a great hint is to wear underwear that is a few sizes too big, and then just tape it into place. That will prevent the odd little bulges where elastic grabs into the skin.
Guys, for the most part can't help but look at scantily clad females, and females for the most part couldn't care less about looking at scantily clad males. When PlayGirl went on sale, most of the buyers were gay men.
The example picture in the OP should seriously take away any objection to this. I don't understand the problem.
If there is anyone in the North Texas area that wants to contribute, but needs a photographer, I can help out.

Not only am I a (part-time) pro photographer (www.hurstphoto.biz), I have photo credits in serveral past Skepchick and Skepdude calendars (for www.skepchick.org) and did the bulk of the post processing (all of the tricky processing) for both calendars for 2008.

The 17th is coming up fast.

Calendar makers, do you have anyone to do the post processing, yet?
On a much less serious note, I'd like to organize a boycott of the calendar unless we can get a picture of Monicks for it :-)

Damn! My hit atheist wife and I just visited the traveling Darwin exhibit at the San Diego NHM. She could have slipped a bathing suit on and taken a picture in the mock study! Dayum!
'hit' should read 'hot'. Believe me!
We're on to you!!!


© 2022   Created by Rebel.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service