Try to recall who God was for you when you were a child. List key concepts you learned about God when you were growing up. What or who was the source for your information – parents, friends, TV, religious education?

 

Take one minute and write any word association that you now have with the word “God.” Try not to think, just write whatever comes to your mind.

 

Can you remember a time when you felt jealous, angry, or resentful toward God? Can you take those events and reframe them into more positive feelings and meaningful lessons?

 

The name in the Bible that unfortunately has been translated as “God” is comprised of the Hebrew letters yud, hey, vav, hey and is written out in English as “Y/H/V/H.” It is important to know that “Y/H/V/H” is not a word at all, but a Tetragrammaton – the Tetragrammaton as there is only one – standing for “was/is/and/will be.”

 

How can a human mind grasp Y/H/V/H? How can the human mind imagine the Ultimate Timeless Reality? This is a very difficult idea to grasp because it surpasses our minds. It’s like a drop of water in the ocean, trying to grasp the ocean. Indeed, the best we can say is that we each embody an aspect of reality, but we are not reality. Like the drop of water in the ocean, we exist within reality. Because reality is Y/H/V/H.

 

When Jews celebrate Passover, they sing a song from the Haggadah: “Blessed Is the Place.” One of the terms used to describe Y/H/V/H is the “Place,” Why “the Place”? Because it suggests Y/H/V/H is the place in which we exist, is the reality within which we exist.

 

If you believe in the Big Bang theory – that the word came into being as a primordial explosion with masses of hot, whirling gases that eventually condensed into stars and planets – you would still have to ask: Where did all this happen? What place was this in which the explosion took place? “Who” or “What” facilitated this event?

 

The answer is Y/H/V/H, the Ultimate Reality – the One who embraces all time, all space and all beings.

 

Ultimate reality is beyond all names, all terms, all images. We can’t stuff something as vast and abstract as that any rigid concept or image. When we say “God”, we realize that we only possess a simplistic, limited, inadequate understanding of the Ultimate Reality, the Source of All Being, the Place or the Context of All That Exists.

 

God is dead; it is a lifeless concept, a dead word.

 

Recently Ron, a computer engineer, Hebrew by roots, but an atheist, visited the Western Wall in Jerusalem, the last remnant of the Temple, which stood over two thousand years ago. He thought, “I am an atheist. What the heck, here I am at the Wall, I should do something spiritual.” So he turned to a religious fellow next to him and asked, “Well, what does one do here?”

 

The fellow responded, “Why don’t you recite some psalms?” and he handed him a book of psalms. Ron thought that seemed appropriate and he began to read some verses. Sure enough just within the first few words, he hit upon the “God” word. Although he felt annoyed, he decided to continue. But again the “God” word appeared. Now he was getting very frustrated. How can I say this if I don’t believe in God? He asked himself. Do I have to believe in God to have a spiritual experience?

 

He decided to relate to his predicament as if it were a computer problem. When there is a computer data that he can’t use, he creates a buffer zone and puts it there. Ron decided, I’ll put the “God” word in a mental buffer zone and simply disregard it so I can continue reading the psalms without getting aggravated. And that is what he did.

 

Ron then continued reading and suddenly felt overwhelmed by a flood of inspiration released by the moving poetic words of King David. He was stuck by a profound spiritual experience, which he had never felt before. It was as if he were surrounded by light. Only when he got rid of “God” he was able to understand the Ultimate Living Reality.

 

It is interesting to note that Nietzsche, besides proclaiming that God is dead, also said that unless we experience an infinite whole working through us, our lives have no meaning. Nietzsche didn’t believe in “God.” And neither do I. I believe in the infinite Whole, the One who was, is, and always will be.

Tags: Bang, Big, God, Nietzsche, Psalms., reality

Views: 80

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is as good a place as any to start:

How can a human mind grasp Y/H/V/H? How can the human mind imagine the Ultimate Timeless Reality? This is a very difficult idea to grasp because it surpasses our minds. It’s like a drop of water in the ocean, trying to grasp the ocean. Indeed, the best we can say is that we each embody an aspect of reality, but we are not reality. Like the drop of water in the ocean, we exist within reality. Because reality is Y/H/V/H.

 

You seem to be saying first, by asking the rhetorical question "How can a human mind grasp Y/H/V/H?" and "How can the human mind imagine the Ultimate Timeless Reality?", that this isn't possible, that we simply can't grasp or imagine what this thing is or even might be. But while saying that, and while just a few sentences later saying "Ultimate reality is beyond all names, all terms, all images.", you're prepared to pretend to enough of a grasp and imagination to be able to name it, term it, and imagine it.

 

The language you're using sounds very profound but when you really think about it it means nothing. What does it tell us– positively and specifically– about this Ultimate Timeless Reality, an entity purported to be a factual reality?

 

I find myself thinking about what former Mormon High Priest Thomas Riskas, following philosopher of religion Kai Nielsen, says of stuff like this commenting on Mormon theologian B. H. Roberts:

What rational sense can we as skeptical outsiders or believing insiders make of it– either in part or as a whole? First, the entire passage presupposes the existence of [Y/H/V/H] but does not provide us with a reference range for [Y/H/V/H] or a coherent conception of [Y/H/V/H]. We have no better understanding of what the term [Y/H/V/H] means conceptually after reading this passage than before. Its statements or truth claims are at least apparently without possible truth-conditions and therefore without factual significance or cognitive meaning. Individually and collectively these statements do not appear to add up to anything that could even remotely be justifiable, let alone justified as rational beliefs.

(Deconstructing Mormonism: An Analysis and Assessment of the Mormon Faith 2011 pp113)

 

And on this:

If you believe in the Big Bang theory – that the word came into being as a primordial explosion with masses of hot, whirling gases that eventually condensed into stars and planets – you would still have to ask: Where did all this happen? What place was this in which the explosion took place? “Who” or “What” facilitated this event?

 

Ignorance of cosmology is no firm foundation for making grand claims. It wasn't an "explosion" it was an expansion. And you wouldn't "have to ask" if you first understand that space and time came into being then, making questions like Where and What meaningless because there was no Where or What before there was space and time.

Discover some things:

Why (Almost All) Cosmologists Are Atheists

A Universe From Nothing

A Universe Out of Chaos

The Physics of Nothing

 

Again, the Where and What questions are meaningless; and the Who question is irrelevant.

 

In the end, what you profess to believe in– "the infinite Whole, the One who was, is, and always will be"– has as much evidence going for it as the "God" you disparage. None.

 

RSS

Gizmo Gadget - Purveyros of the finest gadgets this side of the Amazon

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.

Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

© 2013   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service