Ethical Proposition By A Bunch Of Aliens (from one of my philo classes)

So, a bunch of aliens come along and tell us this:

We are beings from another dimension. In case you're wondering, we are the ones who created the comos in which you live. We can destroy it instantly or let it continue on as is. Your choice."

We ask, "What, then, is the choice?"

"Just give us an 8 year old girl who we'll make immortal and we'll give you back your cosmos."

"What will you do with her? Whatever we want. Primarily, we enjoy torture. We'll torture her till the end of time. If you won't do that, we'll bring everything you know to an abrupt end. What is your choice?"

How would you analyze this? The greatest good for the greatest number or what?

Views: 673

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Oh oh. You don't want to know what I think.I think instant annihilation is the answer and any innocent that has seen or felt intense suffering would hopefully agree. I realize some people wouldn't agree if they believe God says to annihilate everyone would be wrong. However, I think it would so go against our instinct to survive we would find it almost impossible to commit to bringing annihilation about.

Aw, man, this could be worse than I thought! Atheist Eschatology, choosing death for themselves and innocents, for "moral" reasons. Sound familiar?

There have been studies about similar questions of morality, with similar results. (Well, assuming the majority here also leans towards mass destruction.) So I must be in the minority.

(Gah! I mean really, maybe more and more people will want to destroy the world just to clear it of every miserable person they believe exists? The only difference here is in how the misery was caused in the first place.)

I hope I'm the one the aliens talk to, because...

I'm screwing the kid over to save the universe.

Shit, I'm so generous I'll give them 2 kids. :D

I would ask these alternate dimension creatures if they knew how to time travel and, if so, would they mind going back to Anne Coulter's 8th birthday and picking her up.

RE Anne Coulter - ever read O. Henry's, "The Ransom of Red Chief"?

LOL

the poor aliens.

LOL! You bad Heather!

LOL

AMEN to that.

I laughed, but now I'm wondering... maybe this has already, actually happened?

I'm glad my idea has at least gotten quite a few laughs - but in all honesty, I was completely earnest in my response.  Thank you, thank you, I'm here all weak!

I hope you applied scepticism:

1) Why should I believe the aliens created the cosmos? They could be pathalogical liars.

2) Is it relevent whether they created it, if they have the ability to destroy it? Why did they create the cosmos - has their purpose been filled, and will they really destroy it?

3) Why should I believe that they can - and will -  destroy the cosmos?

4) If I accept that they are sufficiently immoral to torture a child for pleasure, and to destroy all life, why would I believe that they would refrain from doing so if I acceeded to their demands?

5)If they are so powerful, why do they need our consent to torture a child? Couldn't they just create one, or take one without our knowledge? This could indicate they are less powerful that they claim?

6) Are these aliens themselves immortal, or can I kill them before they have a chance to destroy the world?

7) Is there a third option? Can we persuade the aliens not to torture anyone, or destroy the cosmos? Maybe if we offer them chocolate and high-speed internet they will be satisfied and leave us alone?

8) How long would the 'destruction of the universe' take? Beings that can make others (and presumably themselves) immortal, and created something as complex and as vast as the universe, might think in timescales too great for us to care. If the destruction of the cosmos is going to take more than a few thousand years, then humanity doesn't have much to worry about.

Well the thing about these conundrums is they are posited to be airtight.

We are told to assume that the aliens have proven to everyone's satisfaction (including yours) that they are who they say they are and can do what they say they can do.  And that we only have the two alternatives given, no "out" in a third direction.

Of course the scenario is unrealistically constrained; the point is to force you to choose between two ridiculous and horrific alternatives.

RSS

Blog Posts

What do you do with the anger?

Posted by dataguy on September 20, 2014 at 5:12pm 3 Comments

Aftermath

Posted by Belle Rose on September 20, 2014 at 2:42am 4 Comments

Ads

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service