Doing our job better
When it comes to debates
Hello my friends on T|A :)
I believe that there is always a positive side of the different views of people when it comes to discussions.
I guess that everyone of us has that passion of debate.
But the key is, how to do our job better in this process?
When we see these fallacies of theism... you feel like, yes I wanna debate them right now..
But the important thing in this process is not to focus simply on their erroneous belief, but instead upon focus on what brought them to that belief.
and then go ahead and work on the methodology which relies more upon reason, and logic.
Set your points that are based on your knowledge.. try not to discuss a thing that you feel you are not knowledgeable enogh about it.
Some of us are biologists, mathematicians..etc..
My point of view here is those mathematicians atheists can do their job better and convert people to atheism by using and explaining the Occam's razor.
Psychologists can convert spiritual people to atheism by using nlp?
Humanists did a good job by having the “Humanist Ten Commandments “.
How can anyone of us do his/her job better? do you think he or she should be professional in a kind of knowledge field?
I think it is very interesting to discuss this.
What do you think? I’m so excited to hear your opinion.
thank you ツ..
There are other ways of saying that you know something besides "I believe". The trouble with saying things like "I believe" is that then you have to waste your time on a tangential discussion of whether or not atheists have faith. It fuels the religionists' deliberate attempts to obfuscate the issues. I make a habit of telling people that I have concluded there is no god--just like I conclude that 2 + 2 = 4.
I do this to make clear that I have followed a rigorous process of thought that doesn't involve my "feelings" regarding the matter.
Remember that if you actually corner them with logic, their humiliation will make them dangerous.
Looks really cool. Thanks for sharing Doone.