If China's growth is subsidized at all, it's surely subsidized by the amount of goods we buy from them.
But they are a growing competitor with the United States and clearly want to control Asia and the Pacific.
Meanwhile, we have a border problem with Mexico, another country with a lot of impoverished citizens. If we're going to do a lot of trade with a country, Mexico makes a lot more sense than China. Improving their economy could eventually totally eliminate the problem of undocumented "illegal" workers coming across the border for work.
Yet, I hear neither candidate promoting this idea? Why don't they?
Tags: Mexico, international, trade
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on September 30, 2012 at 5:11pm Or, as the lion said to the leopard, "Let us prey --"
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on September 25, 2012 at 3:07pm I suspect that is because they - to their detriment - have not chosen to employ you as their advisor.
Permalink Reply by james boag on September 30, 2012 at 4:36pm Actually Obama was working in that direction I believe, general systems theory is getting more and more well known even at the street level. The president is I believe a systems thinker. Because someone draws an imaginary line on the ground, calls it a boundary/boarder does not mean it is an independent system, all systems are open system, and helping Mexico is not a selfless act, but could only be in the interest of all parties concerned, Your suggestion connotes systems thinking.
Started by Redlilly Pond in Welcome to Think Atheist. Last reply by Lance Angus Miles 18 seconds ago. 22 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Teri G on May 24, 2013 at 2:29am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
