Which is understandable to a certain degree, but in almost no other aspect of a person's life, are they like that. That's what baffles me.
Yes, actually you are right. When it comes to subjects that require insight, their ability to make an emotional decision and then only acknowledge facts (or usually suppositions) that support that view is unsurpassed.
I was specifically talking about subjects that don't require any insight. Sorry I didn't say that. Things like math and certain basic demonstrable physics.
But, yes, when it comes to anything that involves emotions, like politics, then those people definitely won't admit any faulty thinking.
The reason I would give for this is that, unlike most things that people learn, religious belief tends to be drilled into peoples' heads at a very early age, and is forced on them in such a way that they become psychologically conditioned to automatically rationalize any inconsistencies in their beliefs as part of "god's mystery" or some similar shit. They also tend to be conditioned to such a degree that they can't even conceive of a world in which there was no skydaddy watching over them.
These are not good reasons for their belief, of course, but the indoctrination they experience from culture and authority effectively stunts their ability to think rationally about this subject. It appeals to emotion and becomes so closely tied to their psyche that at even the slightest hint of doubt, their own mind automatically throws up psychological barriers to prevent even the slightest hint of rationality from slipping through to their religious sensibilities.
Religion is essentially a culturally instituted neurological disorder which prevents rational thought in specific situations. This gives politicians and clergymen a nice area where they can operate in such a way that allows them to convince even the most intelligent people of the most idiotic ideas, provided this type of theological conditioning has been properly developed.
The question then becomes:
Are stupid people easier to indoctrinate?
Hey TAA. You seem to enjoy playing "devil's advocate" here. Just wondering, are you by any chance religious or do you just like getting people to explain things?
BTW, I'm not saying it's bad to get people to explain things at all. I rather enjoy it. I think it really improves a person's debating skills, which I believe that anyone who wants to get in the ring with a xian needs. Just curios what your stance is. :)
Well, in that case I think you are unwittingly doing people a favor. If someone makes a blanket statement of "they are all stupid", that person needs to be called out. Personally, I don't think we need to go "easy" on religious people, or even really show much respect for their delusions. On the other hand, it does us no service at all to generalize (unless you are specifically saying you are generalizing) and make personal attacks on people because of their delusion. I think it is much better to make concise, unemotional statements that make people think. When we drop into emotional arguments, we are playing on their field and they have much more practice at irrational arguments than we do.
What you are unintentionally doing is making people actually think about their position and articulate it in a way so as to bring out any absurd, uninformed sentiments. I think that is a very good thing. So, for that, thanks! :)