Disappointment with the grammar and spelling of some TA users

I've noticed that many of the forum discussions that TA has tweeted lately have contained glaring grammatical and spelling errors.  I find this disappointing and even personally embarrassing as it inevitably reflects not only on the original poster but on the forum as a whole and, by extension, the larger atheist community.  I know written communication isn't everything, and it certainly isn't a high priority among the public generally, but we should try to meet a higher standard.  Given the unlikelihood that individual posters will suddenly take more care when writing, I think the operators of the site's Twitter feed should consider not tweeting discussion titles with serious errors.

That's one poster's opinion, for whatever it's worth.

Tags: grammar, spelling

Views: 2942

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

BTW, I am the opposite of many. My grasp of spelling and grammar is intuitive. If you ask me for the rule for this and that, I generally haven't a clue, and yet I seldom am wrong. "Place an 'i' befoe 'e' except after 'c'" is about the extent of my knowledge of the rules.

Not to mention "let's" for "lets" in his post previous to that one.

As an exercise I carefully read all of the posts on the last two pages and most of them contained one minor typo or another.

Unseen--and many other's--sentences scan and his mistakes are clearly that:  mistakes.  I think the real complaint here is people who are clearly ignorant because they make the same goof over and over--and especially those who are proud of their ignorance or excuse it; whose response when called on it is basically "fuck off."

The big problem for me, Steve, is that now this has become such an issue, I'm seeing mistakes in comments that I never noticed before, and I don't like that about myself - I just want to go back to the way I was.:(( crying

You need that WABAC machine from the old Rocky & Bullwinkle cartoons.

That was some kid and his dog, whose names I can't recall, not Rocky & BW.

As Samantha affirms, they were one of the bits on the Rocky and Bullwinkle show.

I ultimately remembered "Mr. Peabody," but didn't post it because I couldn't recall the name of his pet boy, but you're right, it was, "Sherman."

As for whether or not it was part of the "Rocky and Bullwinkle Show," I wouldn't know - unlike Unseen, I had more important things to do than sit around and watch cartoons.

Well, apparently, arch, the more important things didn't include learning that Protestantism began with a dissident priest and not a character from a comic book. So, while I was watching TV you were reading Superman.

So you're saying you were watching TV, while I was improving my reading skills - that certainly explains a lot --

No, I was honing my observational skills. And I learned how to spell "Bullwinkle."

"that let's people get by" - "'i' befoe 'e'" - "I seldom am wrong"

Except when you are --

What's that they say about glass houses?

I did say seldom. You're far from proving otherwise. Making a mistake is a far cry from not knowing the difference.

"Luthor"? Hahaha!!!





Started by Stephen Gunn in Small Talk. Last reply by Erock68la 12 minutes ago. 5 Replies


Started by Glen L in Small Talk. Last reply by Glen L 1 hour ago. 4 Replies

Disorders of Sex Development

Started by ɐuɐz ǝllǝıuɐp in Small Talk. Last reply by Simon Paynton 1 hour ago. 12 Replies

Deepak's challenge

Started by Davis Goodman in Small Talk. Last reply by Unseen 6 hours ago. 29 Replies


Blog Posts


Posted by Quincy Maxwell on July 20, 2014 at 9:37pm 11 Comments

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service