I am curios how people here define Religion. From my experience, people have different understanding of what constitutes religion. What is necessary for something to be considered a religion? Some have argued that Science is a religion, do you think that is stupid? Or do you think they may have a point?

Views: 2

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

An excellent link, Nelson.

Jordon, science is not a religion, although many have tried to claim it as such, and there have been more than a few science fiction novels dealing with science-as-religion.

One of the core differences between science and religion that is not mentioned in Nelson's link is that science is inherently self-correcting. Checks, cross-checks, peer reviews, the willingness to allow any theory or hypothesis to be disproven when the evidence does not support it is an essential part of science, but anathema to religion, with its dependence upon revealed truths and belief without evidence.

RSS

Blog Posts

PI = 4

Posted by _Robert_ on September 16, 2014 at 8:53pm 4 Comments

Invictus

Posted by Marinda on September 11, 2014 at 4:08pm 0 Comments

Ads

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service