I am curios how people here define Religion. From my experience, people have different understanding of what constitutes religion. What is necessary for something to be considered a religion? Some have argued that Science is a religion, do you think that is stupid? Or do you think they may have a point?

Views: 2

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

An excellent link, Nelson.

Jordon, science is not a religion, although many have tried to claim it as such, and there have been more than a few science fiction novels dealing with science-as-religion.

One of the core differences between science and religion that is not mentioned in Nelson's link is that science is inherently self-correcting. Checks, cross-checks, peer reviews, the willingness to allow any theory or hypothesis to be disproven when the evidence does not support it is an essential part of science, but anathema to religion, with its dependence upon revealed truths and belief without evidence.

RSS

Support T|A

Think Atheist is 100% member supported

All proceeds go to keeping Think Atheist online.

Donate with Dogecoin

Members

Forum

Science Isn't About Truth

Started by Ari E. S. in Philosophy. Last reply by Unseen 1 hour ago. 10 Replies

Blog Posts

Dead man's Switch

Posted by Philip Jarrett on April 18, 2014 at 11:29pm 0 Comments

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Into life hacks? Check out LabMinions.com

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service