Possibly a deist god?
Please note, I am not saying that this does prove a god, I am simply asking a question. I am concerned about this particle being referred to as "The God Particle".
Why is it called The God Particle? Is this an attempt to be very misleading or is there some other reason it was called this?
Permalink Reply by Doug Reardon on July 4, 2012 at 6:26pm No!
Permalink Reply by Keith Murphy on July 4, 2012 at 10:10pm Care to elaborate?
Permalink Reply by Doug Reardon on July 4, 2012 at 10:58pm Why would anyone think it could?
Permalink Reply by Keith Murphy on July 5, 2012 at 8:02am They are calling it "The God Particle". I'm not saying that it is, but I'm trying to understand why it would be called this.
Permalink Reply by Kim on July 5, 2012 at 2:06pm They nicknamed it the God particle because of its significance. This particle gives all other particles mass. Without this particle, the universe would just be a soup bowl of particles zooming around at the speed of light. There would be no stars, planets, galaxies....and no you and me. Hence, it is called the god particle. It's a metaphor.
Permalink Reply by Ezra T. Klatt on July 9, 2012 at 9:37pm Leon Lederman, an atheist physicist, coined the term much to the dismay of Peter Higgs who first potulated the existence of the Higgs Boson. Lederman used the phrase as part of his 2006 book The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question? Despite the unfortunate name of his book, Lederman was not making the case for any kind of deity.
Kim's reply is a pretty succint explanation of the importance of the Higgs Boson
Permalink Reply by Unseen on August 24, 2012 at 11:35pm I just called a pretzel "The God Pretzel." That means God might exist, right? It might even prove it!
Permalink Reply by James Cavanaugh on August 28, 2012 at 12:59am It was actually called the goddam particle in an article about it because it was "so goddam hard to find" and the name god particle was the result of a misprint that an editor ran with. It is nothing more than an unfortunate misnomer that has nothing to do with the nature of the Higgs boson.
Permalink Reply by james d on July 5, 2012 at 12:12am the only thing that MIGHT prove the existance of ANY god is a physical revelation of said being. short of that, theories and apologists bullshit don't prove anything other than men make up shit when they want to believe something they can't prove!
just sayin'
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on July 5, 2012 at 9:40am James d - long time! I'm thinking that if the Higgs Boson had anything to do with god, the stone would never have needed to be rolled away from the tomb - Yeshua could simply have nullified the charge from the "God" Particle, flown apart, then reassembled on the other side, assuming he could find all of his atoms. Of course, that would be kinda like looking for an atom in an atom stack --
Started by G in Ethics & Morals. Last reply by archaeopteryx 1 minute ago. 347 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Rob Klaers on June 17, 2013 at 2:00am 3 Comments 1 Like
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
