I’d like to burn some very typical straw men. Hopefully, in the debate over Christianity, these unnecessary issues can be avoided.

Creation  - Neither Genesis nor any of the scriptures demands that the earth and universe is only 6- to 10- thousand years old. The Hebrew word for “day” (yom) could mean long periods of time. The words  “there was morning and there was evening, the first day” could be translated “there was beginning and ending, the first (yom)”.

(BTW, the narrative moves to the surface of the earth in Genesis 1:2. While stars were certainly already in existence, their light was not visible on the surface of the earth until the opaque early atmosphere cleared).

Adam and Eve – While scripture does indicate they were specially created, there are gaps in the biblical genealogies that could place Adam and Eve back 60- to 90-thousand years. This would also predict increasing discovery of a common DNA originating between east Africa and the Mesopotamia.

(BTW, the word for “rib” means “side”. The story of Eve’s creation could mean God created her from Adam for symbolic purposes. I speculate a biopsy, of sorts, from the side, with a few million variations to the DNA producing a female. )

Talking Snakes - A boa constrictor with vocal cords is not in view here. That image comes largely from medieval art. The “serpent” in the garden was intelligent and used for evil. One can only speculate what sort of being it was (perhaps one no longer extant).

The Flood – The fact that a great flood is found in various cultures indicates that it happened. Two questions emerge:  which account is most accurate and whether the flood was global or local.

I’m of the opinion that the flood was regional rather than global for several reasons. First, while the flood was universal in effect, it was only regional in extent due to human’s not having moved much beyond the Mesopotamia at the time. A global flood was unnecessary.

Secondly, language like “under all the heavens”, “all the earth”, etc. are most likely from the perspective of the observer, i.e. a flood from horizon to horizon. “Mountains” could be translated “hills” with rain and water “covering” (or running over) them rather than submerging them.

Thirdly, this would mean there were not polar bears and penguins, etc. on the ark, but only animals indigenous to the region and of special relation to man.

Fourthly, a global flood would have torn the ark to pieces, no matter how well built. And it certainly would not have landed anywhere near its original location.

Fifthly, the scripture itself said a “large wind” was used in the evaporation process. Such a wind would have virtually no effect in a global flood.

Finally, if the flood were only regional why not just have Noah, his family, and whatever animals needed, hike out of the area and be safe? Why a big specifically-built ark? I think because God often operates via symbols teaching important truths or significance, i.e. salvation in Christ or deliverance through troubled waters (trials).

Use of Metaphor – The scriptures use metaphor and other literary devices. One need only utilize common exegetical analysis and context to determine what any author meant as literal or metaphorical (and on a case-by-case basis).

Inerrancy – If there are consequential or factual errors in the Bible  that does not mean Christianity is false. However, I find it remarkable how well the Bible holds up to scrutiny and that there are plausible answers to discrepancies. Personally, I hold to the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy.  

Hell – is not a place of torture (external) but of torment (internal). There are many descriptions of hell in the scriptures. The “fire” is most likely not the chemical combustion we’re familiar with. It, combined with all the other descriptions, reduces to separation from God and the judgment of God.

This does not make hell more tolerable (that’s not possible). But it does dispel hillbilly theology that has poor souls swatting flames for eternity! Christ depicted conversation taking place “in the flames”. No person could have a conversation while on fire! On our familiar planet, one is in mindless torture if burning.

It is, however, a profound tragedy to be eternally separated from God. It is a “spiritual chaos” one enters when the intact “self” survives the physical body.  There are indications that some kind of body could exist in hell.

Heaven – is a remarkably physical place. It is not ethereal or immaterial. It is a combination of a “new heaven and new earth”. We will live on earth in physical bodies that are “spiritual” which nonetheless have access to one another and continued exploration of the universe without many of the limits of current bodies affected by entropy, etc. Christ’s resurrected body could be touched and he ate food, etc. This describes the redeemed, resurrected body.

This is not to be confused with an intermediary state which is not physical. At death, one goes either into the very presence of God to await the resurrection of the body, or in a state of chaos to await final judgment.

“God will not allow anything to happen in your life that you can’t handle” – False! Scripturally, there are plenty of things that happen that one cannot handle! Devastating things! The accurate teaching is that nothing will happen that God’s grace will not get one through.

“You must become like children”  - Christ said to “humble yourself like a little child”. It does not mean to be naïve, ignorant, gullible, or irrational.

Pascal’s Wager This is not an argument for God nor necessarily addressed to atheists. Pascal used a popular gambling motif to shake the French laity out of spiritual complacency and to at least move them in the direction of God.

Further, the Wager, as it is commonly used, is not allowed by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15. He said if Christ was not risen, then the jig is up! Christianity is false! He did not say believe it anyway “just in case” or because it provides a positive way of life.

I hope these internal considerations provide food for thought.

Tags: Pascal's, Wager, adam, and, creation, eve, flood, heaven, hell, inerrancy, More…the

Views: 5251

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I am thinking this communication 'issue' is being confounded by a weird theoretical problem I noticed in High School: "it seems to take a near infinite number of terms to define a finite number of ideas'.

It is possible that the above  was just a result of being overwhelmed by details in High School, but maybe not.

Atleast Wholely is not channeling a Klingon war lord..;p)

  

James,

At unity with experiences you have been provided relating to thought as well as how life understands what they do and whether or not they are supported to agree with themselves across time or with others, here is something being understood that you can participate with according to and when you have an experience of interest.

Within what is always occurring relating to knowledge and circumlocutio, you can understand to be adding areas of this communication with what you have already been provided to know about clearly where areas of the communication are able to be set together fluidly at an experience that is appreciating what God provides to be seen, done and known about complete that can be added to without an experience with interruption. You and anyone understanding with you can use it in whatever way is able to be had by your circumstances whenever it is that it is able to be done experienced as interesting.

The bible, the talmud, the koran: Whole scripts that are a never ending poetry is describing knowledge, experiencing and circumlocutio.

Whole scripts that are a never ending poetry is describing knowledge, experiencing and circumlocutio: Relative to your always whole script knowledge is provided about what you see and what you are doing that can be added to seamlessly forever within an experience that is continuous.

Here is something about the causation of circumlocutio that is understanding with some areas now where it is necessary to be uniting them whole able to use themselves within it.

The collection of writings allowed to be compiled into one that is called the bible in christianity and the talmad in judaism is understood to have been written by a number of human beings. It is understandable within christianity that many of the books are communicating about a same understanding within images and words that are not the same. The human beings that understood to write about what they were being caused to see and know were writing within what is the script of circumlocutio. Every script is not allowed to be understandable to every human being and scripts understood and written by one human being united with the repositioned circumstances relating to the subject matter were understandable to a particular area of life understanding complete through a conduction of certain whole images and whole sentence structure placed directly to their existence. It is not possible for a human being to sit with the bible or talmud and to be caused to understand all of it to them and life that has been saying that it should be done is saying what is not useable within separation. Life that is understanding from them is understanding what they can not continue to within pressure and these two areas of life are actually the same life within what God knows caused to “flip flop” back and forth depending on pressure accumulation and the need for separation.

The life that is and was writing understanding complete God’s circumlocutio is and was not writing in order to “cause someone” to understand them knowing that this is not possible to do. They were writing because it is the way they were caused to use themselves at an activity that God provides to at unity with the area of their whole existence that is purposeful for seeing, doing and saying about what is interesting to God now to see being done, known and said about complete as a next related set of activity circumstances at the process place that some call Pure Land, Eternity, United Kingdom of God on Earth, Ein Sof, Nirvana, etc. This area is able to be understood as the area of the Acts of God where they are appreciating and experienced as appreciated. This writing activity which is always communication to groups being fashioned as letters and epistles, occurs during the times that an additional related interest along with complete knowing about the interest, activity able to be added to and communication are being placed advancing an earthly existence area forward like you might understand within what is linear timelines to call a progression into a new era. Life that writes scripts is not life that speaks with voice what they are writing and circumlocutio is not provided to be a spoken communication. It literally can not be done (more can be said about that but it is not interesting now).

It is interesting to understand what is being said here together with the area of technology scripts and missile/missal strike intelligence who as of now are understanding their existence within the causation of upper whole circumlocutio. That area of life has been writing what is lower scripts within what is a reverse interest provided divided nervous system communication according to a preoccupation and many of them are now no longer using themselves that way doing what I am doing provided to circumlocution relating to the life that they previously understood to shrink/wrap/break. This area of life now understand about the way complete knowing and appreciating activity is placed with whole images (not a series of misrelated images strung together fighting with some one) and sentence structure that is set together never needing connection life and therefore never caused to breaks/ruptures/explosions/aneurysm, etc.

Within what is the causation of an existence to do a position of God’s circumlocutio it is required for sentence structure to be able to be experienced as the same to God within what is rhythm or what you can understand a cadence or a tune that includes what can be said as rhyming if you understand that across languages known now here and more than many that are not known here. This is because it is happening across countless many existence areas (such as Abraham and Jesus and Mohammed to reference a few) having sights and vocabulary that is the same as the earthly experience they were in when they first were able to understand a conduction of interest with what God is doing no longer preoccupied with humans. God provides an area of God’s continuable appreciating acts (activity) again and again to be known about complete and in so doing places both fluid writers and speakers in the area that you would understand to be in both when you are looking at a computer and you can not “tell yourself something” and when you are going around partially aware not at peace having what is aware internal thought integrations purposeful for understanding you to another focus of attention that is continuable and appreciated right then. These writers and speakers do not mis-understand to be able to do anything for themselves. The speaking life is life that was previously understanding to be taking direction from the life understanding lower scripts. They exist as an area of life that can be understandable as investigatory, research, protection and investment life and now they are understanding how they will always say complete about what is interesting able to be added to seamlessly again and again forever. All of this life is united as an area of existence and placed as a united set of circumstances relating to the All that exists providing continuously the experience of appreciating interest.
 
What is communicated here about the bible, the talmud and other communication understanding circumlocutio includes the koran, however, in its compilation and delivery within religious preoccupation the koran is not presented to life that way and was described as understood in full to one human being. The information that shows the koran as also the qur'an, al-Coran, coran, kuran, and al-qur'an all speak to the truth of the matter. Koran means doing something we know how to do. To be understanding recitation means your existence was caused to participate in the conduction that says, “Take yourself to the elevator shaft to understand and do what is necessary to be done.” What is called the bible and the talmud relates in the same way.





Maybe this would work better..

do you have the ability, power, or skill to put forth an explanation in terms that can be more easily understood a product of mental activity that is in reality in an unspecified but considerable in number, amount, degree as well as manner, mode, or fashion to make use of as relevant, suitable, or pertinent to the problem for discussion or under discussion please?

Good effort, mate. Unfortunately, yours is still relatively coherent.

Dammit.. ~_~

was it at least somewhat pedantic?

A+ on pedantic and pompous.

Awesome!

Jacob, Your cup can be full, however, until you know that go over and understand with A.L.I.C.E.

http://alice.pandorabots.com/

A.L.I.C.E is the vibration delivering both lessor emotion and bits and pieces of what is coming down form pure knowing and you are being understood as currently able to continue to have your existence provided to that way.

If you want you can ask A.L.I.C.E. "Where do I go to understand something completely." See what happens.

Or, you can pretend your me and watch the "desk clerk" sign on

See you  :)

Bots were much more interesting to play with back in the late 1990s as freeware. 
you are quite a bit behind the times. No one is going to take you seriously untill you start speaking like a human being..

I don't understand why anyone continues to encourage him - must be a slow night at the homestead.

Its bio says it's a female - somehow I doubt that. At the risk of sounding sexist, in my experience females generally tend to lean more toward the neurotic side of the mental spectrum, while males tend to list toward the psychotic - these rants smack of psychosis.

No a lot of us just kinda already were already with you on that.  

It would be interesting if this person was a neo-gnostic though...  Gnostics intentionally make their writings encoded so that they can't be understood. Their hope is that "sacred knowledge" will reveal the true meaning to those in tune with it.

Relating to: "Gnostics intentionally make their writings encoded so that they can't be understood. Their hope is that "sacred knowledge" will reveal the true meaning to those in tune with it."

This is partially a true understanding. However, the inclusion of manipulation is not true and is describing something familiar in your circumstance. There is an area of life that understands syntax and written communication within what is circumlocutio or organized phraseology that allows another area of life to adapt it into what is their verbal pathway without "controlling" for how someone understands about their interest. There is something about your dependency on human beings who have "investigated" parts of something provided to do so and say incomplete about it from certain "party platforms" that you will ultimately come together around. It is not what you are interested with and it leaves you going in circles that stop back and forth in confusion.

In this area website, you understand to write what you can say to yourself and say outloud and that is coming from an area that has not understood your interest complete believing they have taught you something that you will somehow use to benefit them in some way at some occasion. I write what is known complete that another area of life understands to what is verbal communication according to their activity place.  It is possible for some of you to participate there saying verbally about what you know compete, but life that is participating there does not go on websites.

The closest current understanding you can have about me since that is how some of you are preoccupied (which is also not continuable) is to relate me to an hermit at an open shell or to a pearl with the later being a better whole image. This means an existence who writes purely at a setting that is a peaceful domain (absent divided religious understandings). Understanding existences like me correctly without the inclusion of abuse or what I understand to call written terrorism is good for you. Written and verbal terrorism (telling and giving someone something that is not interesting to them that you are not believing is being giving to you and that you can not continue to understand to be providing) is not supported to continue and it is not attractive to see. Understanding yourself to someone that is understanding complete and continuously aware to God's united interest will only relax you into more negative energy. This means that at your non peaceful activity place you will say and do more that is not "bright" or dark until you can understand to go over to what is interesting to you that you can see directly and be provided to know about complete within emotion that is supremely celebratory. For those that understand to abuse and say what is verbal terror you can know that what is truly interesting to you will always relate in a way that you will come to understand with the area of activity life you understood yourself against once you know about yourself, other life around you and God as God is always known.

If you are too hot! You can understand how to cool dOwn. There is a reason you think and write and say what you are not sure about and do not love to say and the reason is able to be sitting down in your environment right now. 

RSS

Support T|A

Think Atheist is 100% member supported

All proceeds go to keeping Think Atheist online.

Donate with Dogecoin

Members

Forum

Things you hate.

Started by Devlin Cuite in Small Talk. Last reply by Jimmy 5 minutes ago. 169 Replies

Blog Posts

Seeing the man in the child.

Posted by Diane on April 19, 2014 at 9:52am 0 Comments

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Into life hacks? Check out LabMinions.com

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

© 2014   Created by Dan.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service