Recently comedian Tracy Morgan came under fire for going too far with homophobic remarks during a stand up routine in Nashville. Morgan's act was so homophobic that people were walking out and gay and lesbian support groups were demanding an apology. I came across a really great article on the Globe and Mail web site: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/lynn-crosbie/tracy-morgans...

 

The article poses some valid questions about entertainment, free speech and hatred. Personally I am on the side of free speech and agree with the article's conclusion

"Can you sincerely ask a religion, a canon of ethics, to apologize? Yes, you can. You can speak up, and educate...Worse, by being tight-lipped, ignorant, censorious prigs, we are also at fault. I would rather fight than switch to the paranoid land of surveillance and retribution that is language, under arrest."

Thoughts? Would you walk out? Do you support the right of someone to say what they want, even if clearly hate filled? When does it stop being funny?

 

 

 

 

Views: 2

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

      He wasn't jokes... he was ranting.   It was more of a speech then any punchlines.     All you have to do is switch out gay with Black or Jew and have someone say " If my son came home with a black girl I'd stab him"

 Or if My daughter dated a jew "I'd stab him".     Then it wouldn't be a question of "is it hate or comedy"

I'm on the fence about this one but I think it's better not to advocate the killing of someone because of the way they were born. He can have all the free speech he wants but if most people also don't feel like watching his movies or tv show that's fine also. He's just a bigoted idiot.
I actually don't see any issue in this whatsoever; people who were truly offended by his act left. Their community asked for an apology. He chose to apologize. It seems like it's more media hype trying to drive it into something other than it is. Whipping up your reader's sense of indignation is a great way to sell or get subscribers. Nothing new there. Just another dirty tactic.

George Carlin (my favorite comedian) offended a lot of people and spent a lot of time in jail for it. That, right there, is where the line is crossed. If Tracy had been tossed into jail and harassed by police he'd have people on his side. Using laws to control civil liberties is ridiculous. Nothing in this story approaches that line.

He had the right to speak. They had the right to leave. He chose to apologize for PR reasons. I think his form of comic entertainment is pretty crude myself, but if he has an audience, that's their choice. Just because one has a right to speak doesn't mean everyone else has an obligation to listen. I'm pretty sure hate as comedy is going to slowly die out. Education is the best cure we can give. Hopefully education budgets can get ramped up instead of being cut. Now that is an issue to care about.
Really there needs to be zero tolerance for this kind of thing. The only way to beat things like this is to make it socially unacceptable. Take, for example, spousal abuse. Even thought technically illegal this used to be a regular occurrence anyway. That was because it wasn't deemed unacceptable. When other men and women began speaking out and educating the problem became far less common. It became socially unacceptable. This is the way to beat hatred too.

RSS

Forum

We cannot think like our ancestors

Started by Matt Giwer in Philosophy. Last reply by Ron Humphrey 25 minutes ago. 20 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Services we love

Backup your stuff: Dropbox and SugarSync.

Atheist Web Hosting. TA members get 20% off
RFEHosting.com
We are in love with our Amazon
Book Store!

 

Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m

© 2013   Created by Morgan Matthew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service