I was watching the news earlier and Boston is putting up a "holiday tree" this year instead of a Christmas tree, in order to be political correct . (it's the same type of tree, just a different name). Of course the Christians are all up in arms, about invading a symbol of their religion (despite the fact that the Christmas tree started off as a pagan fertility symbol).
This said, I'm not sure what I think of it all. Normally, I hear atheists say that there should be equal representation in Christmas displays by all religions and atheists or no display at all. By I don't know what to think about "dereligionizing" an icon that is typically associated with Christianity in America. Also since this is Boston and not a small town making the decision, I have to consider if this might be replicated by other towns if it is received favorably.
What do you all think?

Tags: Christmas, and, church, division, of, state, tree

Views: 312

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Happy Festivus, everyone --

Special thanks to Strega!

If there was ever a Humanist carol, that should be it.

I personally don't thin there's much point getting anal about it.   "Christmas" is the current name given to a festival in mid-winter that has been celebrated for thousands of years, and had been celebrated for thousands of years before a potentially fictitious man, who is claimed to be the illegitimate progeny of divine rape.

Enjoy christmas, but remember that it is just a celebration... Carolling and giving presents is mostly non-christian in its roots, and the tree is not originally christian.

RSS

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service