Well, keep at it. At least it's in the mother-tongue, English. The risk here is taking it a word at a time, whereby sooner or later Challenger will be exposed in front of the people, for indeed there are others that are grasping the discourse.
In synch with Chopra's idea that the will can break through a drug....
"The will, because it cannot devour, becomes a will to destroy."
(Ludwig Klages, Science of Character)
Fronkey seems knowledge compromised in understanding the becoming-space of time and the becoming-time of space: "We (are [italics]) meaning." (Jean-Luc Nancy, The Gravity of Thought)
Fronkey's "grasped for only a second" is the cynical and reactionary pathology of the closed circle:
'The deepest reason why there cannot be a closed circle is the constitution of time. The interval of time divides everything in advance and makes it impossible for anything to be closed in itself. Without the interval of time there would be neither gift nor economy, since there would be nothing separating the moment of giving from the moment of receiving.....Accordingly when Derrida asserts that the gift we desire exceeds the order of knowledge, it is not because the gift we desire belongs to a noumenal beyond. On the contrary, the gift we desire exceeds the order of knowledge because it is a gift of time, which is unpredictable and cannot be reduced to a given presence.'
(Haegglund, Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life)