I don't think so... I think of at least the big 4 religions (which are based on the soul) there could be no way of believing in god without it.

The reason why I ask is because I think it is FAR more likely that humanity will be able to PROVE that when we die NOTHING happens. Then we could ever prove that there is an invisible creator.

We are learning so much about the brain. We may even be able to transfer our consciousness to a synthetic brain within our lifetime. We may be able to simulate death entirely.

Views: 78

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think religion needs souls..

Many ancient religions did not have doctrines regarding eternal life for the common person.  In the ancient Egyptian religions, for instance, only the Pharaoh had an afterlife - and perhaps obedient servants would be a part of that but not necessarily.

I think of religion as an evolving cognitive virus.  The major religions we have today are here because they burrow so deeply into the psyche and propagate so easily.  The major drawback to a religion not promoting a soul doctrine in today's world would be how unappealing it would seem compared to the religions that do offer that option.

Actually, Heather, even the Old Testament didn't recognize any likelihood of an afterlife until quite late in the book.

RSS

Blog Posts

PI = 4

Posted by _Robert_ on September 16, 2014 at 8:53pm 3 Comments

Invictus

Posted by Marinda on September 11, 2014 at 4:08pm 0 Comments

Ads

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service