Atheists, are you introverted or extroverted?
For a long time people that know me have been telling me they think I may suffer from depression and/or anxiety. So much so that I began to believe it. I am still somewhat open to the possibility, but my position on the matter is: so what? I'm not hurting anyone. I'm certainly not going to alter my body chemistry just because it doesn't match what is "normal". Where would evolution have gone if all species could change themselves back to "normal"?
Last night I read this article about shyness, introversion, and social anxiety. It confirmed many of my thoughts on the matter, and got me to research introversion more. Before, I had been aware of the general idea of introversion/extroversion (never studied psychology that much), but I did not know that it could be such a specific and pervasive behavioral trait. After much reading I found that on the introvert/extrovert scale, I'm about as introverted as you could possibly get.
Anyway, in the article the author references Winifred Gallagher: “The glory of the disposition that stops to consider stimuli rather than rushing to engage with them is its long association with intellectual and artistic achievement." It got me thinking about religion. Are introverts more likely to analyze the inconsistencies and problems with religion before (or even after) committing to one? How many atheists are introverts?
So, do you consider yourself more introverted than extroverted? A poll would be awesome, but I don't see an option to add one.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Erica Sutton on -
Growing up I was always very shy and introverted. It was so bad I wouldn't even say hi to a stranger if we were in a room alone. Now I consider myself both because sometimes I feel like talking to strangers and socializing, and other times I'm really shy. I guess it just depends on what mood I'm in. I like and agree with your reference by Winifred Gallagher. Being introverted, I have noticed that you sit back more and observe/ notice things more often then your extroverted peers do. Maybe they're too busy socializing to realize/ think about the small inconsitiencies in life. It goes back to the old stereotype of jocks and nerds (which by the way, I don't agree with any stereotype). Jocks have always been stereotyped as being extroverted, but dumb as dirt. While nerds, have been stereotyped as smart and introverted. I did a paper one year for college on Atheist, and I found a study on the comparison of IQs between Atheist and Christians. In short, all the atheist in the large study consistently had higher IQs than all the Christians in the study. If you would like me too, I can find that information for you.
-
Permalink Reply by Arcus on -
The MBTI test works pretty poorly if you know about the MBTI test. If you do, you immediately answer where you "want" to be and not necessarily where you are. A better measure is analyzing your personal past behavior against the initial measures.
-
Permalink Reply by Wraith on -
So true. Most psych test fail under this association. Prior knowledge spoils the results.
-
Permalink Reply by Darrell Johnson on -
As a family psychologist, I work extensively with the MBTI. My preferences are for INFP, and it is my observation that most atheists I know of (especially the logical, intelligent ones that like debating and occasionally lack, shall I say, diplomacy!), tend to be NTs — intuitive thinkers. As an NF myself (intuitive feeler), I often feel out of place in this august company because I *am* diplomatic, empathetic, a bit of a people-pleaser, (and with more of a natural inclination towards religion, mysticism and spirituality), and I strive for harmony and finding common ground, above striving for "truth" and "logic".
Concerning the E (extroverted) and I (introverted) dichotomy, I don't find as clear of a split between believers and non-believers.
-
Permalink Reply by erik112358 on -
Thanks for the insight. If you could point me towards those studies, that would be great!
-
Permalink Reply by Arcus on
-
Didn't see this comprehensive reply before posting. My qualification is only a few introductory courses in IO psych.
-
Permalink Reply by Devin Saunders on -
I read that article a few days ago myself. Being a social psychology major, I was pretty intrigued by the evolutionary perspective because I've never thought about it like that before. But I really found your questions about how many atheists might be introverts extremely interesting. I might just have to add that to my list of possible studies to conduct!
While I'd like to think I'm a pretty fair balance of both, I'm definitely more introverted than extroverted. While I do have days where I go out and I act more social than what's normal for me, I have more days where I'm fine staying at home reading or studying for classes. Even though I go to a bit of a party school, I don't feel like I miss anything by not going out every Friday to go club hopping or whatever. I enjoy thinking things out and trying to figure why people act like they do. I know for me that all bled over into my thinking about my religion a few years ago. I started noticing things that didn't sit well with me and in the end, it all led to my becoming an atheist.
-
Permalink Reply by Shamari on -
I'm 20 years old and definitely introverted. Sometimes it gets me thinking about what is acceptable social behavior ("normal" if you will) and why. Is it okay to be introverted, or is it just that extroversion is more acceptable because society rewards sociable people for obvious reasons? I'm not against extroverts or extroversion in general, but sometimes I do wish introversion could be viewed on the same level. I've always been very thoughtful (and hopefully insightful), and I really do think that those qualities helped in my eventual rejection of religion.
-
Permalink Reply by Dylan Sloboda on -
I'd have to agree. Much of what is deemed "healthy" and "unhealthy" in psychology seems to be more rooted in anecdotal rationale than anything else.
-
Permalink Reply by Wraith on
-
It's right cos society says it's right. Not because it's better for any other reason. Just because it's what social needs dictates, doesn't mean it's actually improving anything.
Kill all dissenters, is good for society. Be the dissenter's voice is what drives progress.
Support T|A
Think Atheist is 100% member supported
All proceeds go to keeping Think Atheist online.
What's new today
Events
Forum
Proof of higher morality for atheists
Started by IkeArrumba in Religion and the Religious, Atheism and Atheists 16 minutes ago. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Blog Posts
Neil deGrasse Tyson On Science Deniers
Posted by Everyday Freethought on March 10, 2014 at 11:59am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Videos
The Latest on Giz Gad
Services we love
We are in love with our Amazon
Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!
Into life hacks? Check out LabMinions.com
Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com
© 2014 Created by Dan.
