A contradiction in terms? Perhaps, however, what word would be used otherwise to describe the state of, in a sense,  being aware of being the universe, being aware of its self? And further of that awareness being an influential  factor in a persons behavior?

Or in other words what word to use, to describe someone whose fundamental interpretation of reality, is an active part of their awareness? In non-atheists it is called spirituality, personally I have no problem with atheistic spirituality, it seems to do the job for me; however it could be problematic. I'm curious what other folks here think.


Views: 220

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Evolutionary psychology is obscure at the best of times, but I don't know of anyone other than Jaynes who is suggesting any major events more recent than 10,000 years.  In one criticism someone actually pointed out that the earliest records of the Giglamesh Epic pre-dating is proposed psychic-shift, and he proceeded to suggest the earliest versions lacked introspection.  That is only one account, although I have no reason to disbelieve it, and it would seem that Jaynes felt language and even writing could have arisen before his bicaremal shift, which I would need profound evidence to even consider.

(Reply to Oneinfinity, sorry don't know how I managed to get this out of order, but it was resistant to numerous attempts to fix it.)

"I think, like others have said, that the problem with the term "spirituality" is that it seems to be tied too closely to non-materialistic world views."

Certainly this is a big part of my concern; however, as I've been attending to this notion a lot more since starting this thread, I wonder if we are perhaps being hyper sensitive to this connotation of the word. After all there are already a number of secular uses, spirit of the times, The Spirit of 76, and so on.

Your experience of being outside at night, is the same type of experience that led to me finally coming out to myself after a nearly six month internal war with my former fundamental interpretation of reality.

""is this spiritual?" If not, what? I don't know what else to call it."

Yea, amen and hallejweirdja! That is exactly it, there is, in my opinion, a great need for us to be able to express that, and this is the reasoning that tends me towards just saying to hell with the dualists, I'm using it anyway.

 

It would never have crossed my mind that using this word would be an issue at all. But it seems that the use of the concepts of spirit (from spirare, breathing), spirituality and inspiration as being central to science is being pushed by the Templeton Foundation.  This of course with the motive to corrupt science, as a project necessarily leading to the truth of (Christian) religion, in their characteristically subtle mode of operation.

Since the words are so interwoven with every day language (aspiration, conspiracy, transpiration, perspiration) it is easy and natural to use the word spiritual or spirituality to express and emphasize a sense of awe or wonder so great that sometimes it can be overwhelming and emotional. It is pretty common though I'd think. But the option to religiously charge language that is used in a completely different sense, leaves open the possibility for manipulation of public opinion and this has apparently been recognized by the Templeton strategists in this case.

Those bastards!

I once had a bumper sticker,

WARNING LICENSED SELECTIVE PRESSURE

I took it off after a cop in CA pulled me over to explain what it meant. But there are times that one could almost be tempted.

As far as a word, how about a 'cosmic awareness' or 'feeling of cosmic grounding' or 'feeling of cosmic proportionality'?
How about Saganistic?  Feeling a sense of Saganality, or experiencing Saganism?

Well...  I signed up just to put my 2 cents worth in on this subject... (thanx again, Stumbleupon!)

 

If we define the word "Spirituality" as "a feeling of being connected to or part of a much larger background that is beyond our ability to completely comprehend" then I don't think we have any problem with the concept of Atheistic Spirituality. And, if we wanna get REALLY out there and make a larger leap, we could think upon how we're all the product of the monoblock's explosion. How the "miracle" of our existence and sapiency is merely the product of the dance of the quanta...  In essence, we ARE all connected to EVERYTHING in at least that tiny little incredibly significant way...

 

I actually had to confront this when I read the explanation written by Neil Peart for Rush's "Snakes and Arrows" tour pamphlet. In it, he described one of the songs as a "secular prayer." Perhaps this seeming contradiction in terms would be easy for most atheists to accept, but it sure threw me for a loop.... Then, after reading "Going Postal" by Terry Pratchett, I had the answer... I'll paraphrase what was said... (mostly cuz I'm too lazy to look it up)  "You do know how to pray, don't you? You get down on your knees, put your hands together... and hope."

 

I hope this helps someone... Especially if they dealt with a similar problem... I hope it gives people more incentive to pay attention to Rush lyrics and read Terry Pratchett, too....

 

Peart is an incredible lyricist and definitely delivered Rush from being 'just another hair band' way back when.  I still like the idea of calling it Saganality, however, and belief in it Saganism.

"She peered into the night sky and was filled with a Saganistic glee!"

 

:D although, I'm not sure how Carl would feel about something called, "Saganism."

 

[You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice.

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill;

I will choose a path that's clear,

I will choose Freewill!" -RUSH, Freewill]

As soon as I finished reading that I heard Eric Lifeson taking off on guitar - great!

I'm what could be considered a spiritual "atheist". I am nonreligious and I do not believe in any higher power. I do not believe in creationism. In fact, I believe that we are all just expressions of energy and energy can't be created or destroyed. My spirituality doesn't contradict anything. I believe in science, especially for the fact that it is willing to admit when it is wrong and move on, change its views accordingly. My spirituality is based off me taking the info I have available and making my best guess. I am not religious, so my beliefs aren't restricted from or fearful of change. Religion is just an organized system of spiritual ideas.


I don't understand what you mean by "..it could be problematic." I don't see any problem. What words would I use to describe someone whose fundamental interpretation of reality is an active part of their awareness? A being. Everyone experiences different things and sees the world differently, so everyone has their own perspective of reality and those ideas influence our awareness.


I believe in something beyond the physical world, although I do not believe in the "supernatural".  I do not believe that when we die we are separate human souls dwelling in some heavenly or hellish plane determined by whether or not we pledge allegiance to an angry father in the sky and live according to his word without question, however, I do not believe in a true death because as I said before, we are energy which can't be destroyed.


Spirituality is more of just a deep feeling of connectedness to your true self. You don't have to believe anything or anyone to be spiritual.





RSS

Services we love!

We are in love with our Amazon

Book Store!

Gadget Nerd? Check out Giz Gad!

Advertise with ThinkAtheist.com

In need a of a professional web site? Check out the good folks at Clear Space Media

© 2014   Created by umar.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service