Instead of calling myself an atheist I’d rather call myself a person of reason.
Plus what hits harder when someone asks if you believe in god, replying "No, I'm an atheist." OR "No. I'm a man/woman of reason".
(Though I do realise 'atheist' is a little sexier and easier to google.)
Tags:
Permalink Reply by T A A on December 27, 2012 at 2:00pm I agree with anti-theist... but we're only a small subset of atheists at large. As for non-theist or atheist, they're exactly the same thing IMO.
Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on December 27, 2012 at 1:50pm If being 'x' is the norm, it is useful to have a term which specifies 'not x'. Personally, I don't think it is more complicated than that.
But if you've found something that works better for you, all the best to you. 'Man of reason' doesn't work for me, personally, because I plan to one day melt down and go insane in the grocery store. I'm not quite sure exactly when, but it is definitely going to be in the grocery store. After that happens, I'll just be a 'Man of...' and that's not a very compelling term.
Permalink Reply by Dan Ashton Lloyd on December 27, 2012 at 2:06pm Funniest thing I've read in this discusion. Mainly because I relate.
Permalink Reply by Stutz on December 28, 2012 at 1:56am I don't care for the connotations of the word atheist, though it's technically the most accurate definition of my stance on deities. The simple phrase "I'm not religious" is the most useful and least provocative way I've found to describe myself in most everyday circumstances.
It has it's limitations, though. I've had very religious people tell me that they're "not religious" either; among believers nowadays, it's somewhat fashionable to say that you disavow the "man-made" religion while still believing in God, or that you're a "follower of Jesus" or some such nonsense. In that case, if they push it, you have to draw a clearer line sometimes.
If I'm asked directly if I believe in God, though I don't think I really ever have been asked, I'd have to answer a simple "No," and just leave it at that. I don't feel the need to offer an alternative.
Permalink Reply by Henry Flood on December 28, 2012 at 2:51pm I always make it clear that I prefer anti-theist, and the difference between the two words
Permalink Reply by Danielle Van Eeckaute on December 28, 2012 at 3:25pm When asked why I do not believe in any god/gods, I usually reply that i do not have any imaginary friends.
Danielle
Permalink Reply by T A A on December 28, 2012 at 7:53pm Same here, no imaginary friends, and no imaginary truths :)
Permalink Reply by James Cox on December 28, 2012 at 8:35pm Do theists place as a reference on their resumes, 'Imaginary Friends'. I expect some would 'know' more of the imaginary variety and anything/anyone that was real. If this would happen, it might the rest of us look good!
Permalink Reply by Donald S. Chase on December 28, 2012 at 7:47pm The difference is like going into a gunfight with a .44 Magnum as opposed to a b-b gun.
Permalink Reply by Gregg R Thomas on December 28, 2012 at 8:33pm Every time I try explaining myself to a Theist, they just start bleeding out of their nose...
...I gotta stop doing that. :D
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on December 29, 2012 at 7:04am Kris F., you came close.
Dan, aka man of reason: are there any times in your life that "man of emotion" describes you more accurately?
Rene Descartes didn't feel; he only half was.
Started by Ed in Small Talk. Last reply by Diane 16 minutes ago. 31 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Unseen on June 19, 2013 at 1:26pm 5 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
