Come out of your closet and take your licks. How can you back an explicitly pro-religion party that thinks women are second-class citizens, chattels of their husbands and The State, and who favors widening the gap between the rich and non-rich even more?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Lewal on September 24, 2012 at 9:50am I'd rather live in a poor nation of reason than a rich one of religion.
Permalink Reply by Unseen on September 24, 2012 at 12:56pm Then it's time to become a Chinese citizen. Religion never has had a strong hold on China and it is a country supposedly run by technocrats.
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on September 24, 2012 at 1:15pm Please do - off you go now --
See ya, wouldn't want be ya --
Don't think it hasn't been fun, just because it hasn't --
Permalink Reply by Richard E. Robertson on September 24, 2012 at 11:57pm So much love between you two. ;p
Permalink Reply by archaeopteryx on September 25, 2012 at 12:41am Is it that obvious?
Permalink Reply by Dustin on September 24, 2012 at 5:17pm I classify myself as a libertarian which I suppose is technically a republican. But when I listen to the GOP candidates debate I cringe every 10 seconds from the stupidity of their comments...But I liked most of what Ron Paul said and Huntsman seemed reasonable but they were not outwardly religious enough I suppose.
Permalink Reply by Michael Chalmers on September 24, 2012 at 8:42pm Reading this thread has made me wonder....
Do I have more in common with free-market capitalists who are religious or the OCCUPY protesters who are Atheists?
For me, I take the free-market capitalists with a libertarian bent. If I can also find Atheist ones then I'm happy.
However trying to have a dinner conversation with some leftist hippy who thinks the world owes them & that the government should provide everything....no thanks. Give me the god-botherers. At least I can tune out their religious crap with clear knowledge that they are deluded from birth. The leftist hippies however have arrived at that position usually after thought & deliberation.
Being stupid after careful consideration is a far worse position than being deluded from birth.
Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on September 24, 2012 at 9:13pm However trying to have a dinner conversation with some leftist hippy who thinks the world owes them & that the government should provide everything....no thanks.
What about the leftist hippies who do not think the world owes them (which is actually a group of millions upon millions of people who believe in social welfare measures yet never collect on these programs themselves)?
Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on September 25, 2012 at 6:09am How so?
Permalink Reply by Arcus on September 25, 2012 at 6:13am A(nother) dinner conversation with a leftist hippie, equally infuriating.
Permalink Reply by Kris Feenstra on September 25, 2012 at 6:28am I see. Well, there may be a difference between the two. The 'leftist hippie' in the poem is an attractive young woman who has bought into nonsense. The 'leftist hippie' in this thread may or may not be a man made of straw, which is the heart of my inquiry.
Started by Morgan Matthew in Announcements. Last reply by Gallup's Mirror 41 seconds ago. 14 Replies 2 Likes
Posted by Keith Konecny on May 24, 2013 at 9:30pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
