Tags: abortion, pro-choice, pro-life
Permalink Reply by Stu Ward on December 9, 2010 at 6:36am
Permalink Reply by T A A on January 11, 2011 at 10:32am
Permalink Reply by Jennifer Ulean Breedlove on January 11, 2011 at 12:19pm
Permalink Reply by T A A on January 11, 2011 at 2:40pm
Permalink Reply by Jennifer Ulean Breedlove on January 11, 2011 at 2:49pm I had thought about going till the age of 5, but I don't think i could have handled that with two of them..
I know a few catholics that use it as their birth control..
It didn't work for me.. Neither did the birth control.. lol
Permalink Reply by T A A on January 11, 2011 at 3:38pm
Permalink Reply by Amy L. Cook on December 4, 2011 at 10:10pm I was not breast fed and I am in perfect health. I have an above average IQ, I am almost 40 and I don't have any wrinkles or grey hair, I don't have any deficiencies or diseases... it IS possible to ensure good health without breast milk. I have already mentioned to you several factors that prevent mothers from breast feeding their children, which you have chosen to ignore.
Permalink Reply by T A A on December 4, 2011 at 10:15pm We all know that, it's not like you pointed out some novel piece of science there. Again, it is about intention not accidents. To intentionally birth and infant with the full knowledge that you will deny that infant's first right, the breast. How healthy 'you' personally are is of absolutely no relevance, it's anecdotal, science has fully demonstrated that on a population basis, breast milk fed infants have less health problems.
Permalink Reply by Jewelz on December 5, 2011 at 1:53am Research has shown breastfeeding decreases the incidence and/or severity of (among other things) diarrhea, obesity, general illnesses, urinary tract infections, allergies, respiratory infections, SIDS, insulin-dependent diabetes, crohn's disease, and other chronic digestive diseases. Breastfeeding has also been related to possible enhancement of cognitive development.
The majority of women in the US who choose to formula feed do so out of ignorance and misinformation, not medical necessity. In the extremely rare cases where breastfeeding is not possible, there are certainly alternatives. However, the risks of this sub-standard nutrition should not be disregarded due to anecdotal stories.
Permalink Reply by Jennifer Ulean Breedlove on January 11, 2011 at 2:52pm
Permalink Reply by Amy L. Cook on December 4, 2011 at 10:05pm Wow.
I gave up a baby 16 years ago and I have never regretted it. Aparantly, your friend wishes death upon the child she gave up rather than the happy life he/she, most likely, now has. That's just selfishness, no offense to your friend. Abortion can cause even more guilt and remorse, beleive me. You may not feel it immediately, but the events of your past have a way of resurfacing on you later in life and causing all sorts of mental anguish. Chances are your friend would regret an abortion just as much as she does giving that child up for adoption, and at least that child has a chance to be someone now.
Permalink Reply by Amy L. Cook on December 4, 2011 at 10:16pm Adoption is not for everyone, but please don't condemn it as lazy and mis-informed. It is an option that you have if you become pregnant and you don't want to be a parent.
I am just in shock right now over this attitude towards adoption. Wow. Breast milk is now a right? Like abortion, breast feeding or not breast feeding your child is a personal choice. There are many reasons that you may choose not to breast feed your children, or perhapse you are one of those women who's body cannot produce enough milk, or any at all... then what?
Started by Unseen in Politics, Economics, Civil and Reproductive Rights, International Conflicts. Last reply by Holo Gram 18 seconds ago. 14 Replies 0 Likes
Posted by Dan on May 21, 2013 at 9:18pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
Check out our new mobile/tablet version of Think Atheist! www.ThinkAtheist.com/m
© 2013 Created by Morgan Matthew.
